TaxEar

TaxEarPart 2Business Entities and considerations

Business Entities and Considerations · Business entities

Employer identification number

Verification 2026 Verified
tax year · reviewed 2026-08-21 · Draft for N. O. review
An employer identification number is just a label the IRS uses to track a business, like a Social Security number for a company. This page explains when a business needs one, and when it does not. It affects any business that hires workers, forms a company, or changes its legal shape. It does not affect a business that only changes its name, moves, or adds a location, since none of those need a new number. This page decides when a business must apply for a new number, and who may sign the form asking for one. That person must be a real human who actually runs the business, not a hired agent standing in.

The employer identification number is administrative, and that is why it produces errors. It is not a tax status, not an election, and not evidence of anything about how an entity is classified — it is a label the Service attaches to a filer. Clients treat it as though it carried meaning, and the practitioner’s job is usually to talk them out of an unnecessary application, or into a necessary one they had not thought about.

The rule

The statutory requirement. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 6109(a), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/6109

Which number each person uses. Verified 2026-08-2126 CFR § 301.6109-1(a)(1)(ii), read at law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/26/301.6109-1

Sole proprietors and employers. Verified 2026-08-2126 CFR § 301.6109-1(a)(1)(ii)(D), read at law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/26/301.6109-1

That paragraph is worth reading twice, because it is the answer to the most common misconception. A sole proprietor is an individual, and an individual normally uses a social security number — but a sole proprietor who is an employer, or who is engaged in a trade or business, uses an employer identification number where the return or form calls for one (Reg. § 301.6109-1(a)(1)(ii)(D)). Sole proprietors are not merely permitted to have one; the regulation says they should use one.

Applying. Verified 2026-08-2126 CFR § 301.6109-1(d)(2)(i), read at law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/26/301.6109-1

Who may be named. Verified 2026-08-21IRS, Responsible parties and nominees, page last reviewed 28 June 2026, read at irs.gov/businesses/small-businesses-self-employed/responsible-parties-and-nominees

Who may not. Verified 2026-08-21IRS, Responsible parties and nominees, page last reviewed 28 June 2026, read at irs.gov/businesses/small-businesses-self-employed/responsible-parties-and-nominees

The online application. Verified 2026-08-21IRS, Get an employer identification number, page last reviewed 19 August 2026, read at irs.gov/businesses/small-businesses-self-employed/get-an-employer-identification-number

The daily limit. Verified 2026-08-21IRS, Get an employer identification number, page last reviewed 19 August 2026, read at irs.gov/businesses/small-businesses-self-employed/get-an-employer-identification-number

Keeping the application current. Verified 2026-08-2126 CFR § 301.6109-1(d)(2)(ii), read at law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/26/301.6109-1

When a sole proprietor needs a new one. Verified 2026-08-21IRS, Do you need a new EIN?, page last reviewed 21 July 2026, read at irs.gov/businesses/small-businesses-self-employed/do-you-need-a-new-ein

When a corporation does. Verified 2026-08-21IRS, Do you need a new EIN?, page last reviewed 21 July 2026, read at irs.gov/businesses/small-businesses-self-employed/do-you-need-a-new-ein

When a partnership does. Verified 2026-08-21IRS, Do you need a new EIN?, page last reviewed 21 July 2026, read at irs.gov/businesses/small-businesses-self-employed/do-you-need-a-new-ein

When an LLC does. Verified 2026-08-21IRS, Do you need a new EIN?, page last reviewed 21 July 2026, read at irs.gov/businesses/small-businesses-self-employed/do-you-need-a-new-ein

The one case where a new partnership keeps an old number. Verified 2026-08-2126 CFR § 301.6109-1(d)(2)(iii), read at law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/26/301.6109-1

Current figures

ItemRuleAuthority
Which numberVerified 2026-08-2126 CFR § 301.6109-1(a)(1)(ii), read at law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/26/301.6109-1Reg. § 301.6109-1(a)(1)(ii)
Sole proprietorsVerified 2026-08-2126 CFR § 301.6109-1(a)(1)(ii)(D), read at law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/26/301.6109-1Reg. § 301.6109-1(a)(1)(ii)(D)
Daily limitVerified 2026-08-21IRS, Get an employer identification number, page last reviewed 19 August 2026, read at irs.gov/businesses/small-businesses-self-employed/get-an-employer-identification-numberIRS, Get an EIN
New number — sole proprietorVerified 2026-08-21IRS, Do you need a new EIN?, page last reviewed 21 July 2026, read at irs.gov/businesses/small-businesses-self-employed/do-you-need-a-new-einIRS, Do you need a new EIN?
New number — corporationVerified 2026-08-21IRS, Do you need a new EIN?, page last reviewed 21 July 2026, read at irs.gov/businesses/small-businesses-self-employed/do-you-need-a-new-einIRS, Do you need a new EIN?
New number — partnershipVerified 2026-08-21IRS, Do you need a new EIN?, page last reviewed 21 July 2026, read at irs.gov/businesses/small-businesses-self-employed/do-you-need-a-new-einIRS, Do you need a new EIN?
New number — LLCVerified 2026-08-21IRS, Do you need a new EIN?, page last reviewed 21 July 2026, read at irs.gov/businesses/small-businesses-self-employed/do-you-need-a-new-einIRS, Do you need a new EIN?

How it works in practice

The organising idea across all four lists is that a new number follows a new entity, not a new fact about an existing one. Renaming a business does not create an entity, and nor does moving it, opening another location, or going bankrupt — bankruptcy changes who controls the entity’s assets but not what the entity is, which is why it appears on the “no new number” side for corporations and partnerships. What does create a new entity is a change of structure: a sole proprietor who incorporates, a partnership that incorporates, a corporation that becomes a partnership.

Bankruptcy is the exception that proves the point and it is the item most often got wrong, because it appears on both sides depending on the entity. A sole proprietor who declares bankruptcy does need a new number; a corporation or partnership does not. The reason is that a sole proprietorship has no legal existence apart from its owner, so the bankruptcy estate is a genuinely different taxpayer, whereas a corporation in bankruptcy is the same corporation.

The corporate list contains a pair of items that read like a contradiction until you separate federal classification from State existence. A corporation that chooses to be taxed as an S corporation keeps its number: nothing has been formed, an election has been made. But a corporation that gets a new charter from the secretary of state needs a new one, even if the business is identical, because the State has created a different legal person. The same distinction runs through the LLC list: changing the tax election to corporation or S corporation does not require a new number, while terminating the LLC and forming a corporation does.

The single-member LLC entry deserves particular care. A disregarded LLC with no employees and no excise tax liability can operate on its owner’s number; the moment it must file employment or excise taxes it needs its own, because those returns are filed by the entity rather than by the owner. That follows from the classification rules rather than from anything in the EIN guidance — a disregarded entity is treated as a corporation for subtitle C — and it is the practical reason so many single-member LLCs end up with a number they did not initially need.

Naming the responsible party is a real compliance step and not a formality. The person named must own, control, or exercise effective control over the entity, must be an individual rather than an entity except for government entities, and their own taxpayer identification number goes on the form. A nominee — a formation agent, a registered-agent service, a lawyer holding an interest temporarily — cannot be named. Where the responsible party changes afterwards, the duty to keep the application information current is what obliges the entity to report it (Reg. § 301.6109-1(d)(2)(ii)).

The one-per-day limit is per responsible party, not per applicant or per adviser. A practitioner forming five entities for the same client on the same day will get one number and be refused the rest, which is a scheduling problem worth knowing about before the closing date rather than on it.

Scenarios

The rename that needed nothing

Odalys has operated a landscaping business as a sole proprietor since 2019 under the name Verde Yards, with an employer identification number obtained when she took on her first employee. In 2026 she rebrands as Odalys Landscape Co., registers the new trading name with her county, moves the yard to a site two towns over, and opens a second crew base across the State line.

She needs no new number for any of it. On the IRS guidance a sole proprietor does not need a new employer identification number on changing the business name or location, and additional locations do not change the analysis — she is the same taxpayer conducting the same proprietorship. What she should do is notify the Service of the name and address change so that her account information stays current, which is the point of the obligation in Reg. § 301.6109-1(d)(2)(ii). If she later incorporates the business, that is when the new number is required.

The five closings in one afternoon

A practitioner is forming five single-purpose LLCs for one client, each to hold a separate property, all closing on the same Friday. Each will elect association status and each will have employees, so each needs its own employer identification number. The client is the responsible party for all five. The practitioner plans to obtain all five numbers on Thursday afternoon.

Only one will issue. The IRS limits applications to one employer identification number per responsible party per day, so the remaining four will be refused however the applications are submitted. The constraint is on the responsible party rather than on the person filling in the form, so the practitioner cannot solve it by applying from a different account. The workable answers are to spread the applications across five business days, or — if the entities genuinely have different controlling persons — to name the correct responsible party for each, which is a matter of fact rather than a matter of convenience.

The single-member LLC that acquired an obligation

Teodoro formed a single-member LLCA state-law business structure — a limited liability company — that shields its owners from personal liability for business debts. For tax purposes it can be treated as a sole proprietorship, a partnership, or a corporation, depending on elections and how many owners it has. in 2023 to hold a consulting practice. It made no election, so it is disregarded, and he reports on Schedule C using his social security number. He has no employees. In March 2026 he hires an assistant.

He now needs an employer identification number for the LLC. On the IRS guidance a single-member LLC that has to file excise or employment taxes needs its own number, and the reason lies in Reg. § 301.7701-2(c)(2)(iv)(B): a disregarded entityA business entity, usually a single-member LLC, that the tax law treats as if it doesn't exist separately from its owner. The owner reports the entity's income directly on their own return. is treated as a corporation for the subtitle C taxes, so it is the employer, and the Forms 941 and W-2 are filed in the LLC's name and number rather than Teodoro's. The income tax position is unchanged — Schedule C continues — which is precisely the combination that confuses clients. One entity, two identifying numbers, both correct.

The partnership that dissolved and the one that did not

Two engineering partnerships each undergo a change in 2026. In the first, one of three partners buys out the other two and continues the business as a sole proprietor. In the second, one of three partners sells their entire interest to a new incoming partner, and the firm continues with three partners as before.

The first needs a new number. A partnershipA business with two or more owners that itself generally pays no income tax. Instead, its income, deductions, and credits pass through and are reported by the owners. whose business is taken over by one partner operating as a sole proprietor is on the IRS list of changes requiring a new employer identification number, and the reason is that the partnership has ceased to exist — there is one owner where there were three, and a proprietorship is a different taxpayer. The second does not: a change in ownership that does not terminate the partnership is expressly on the "no new number" side, and the firm keeps filing Form 1065 under the number it has always had.

Traps
  • A name change never requires a new number. Nor does a change of location, nor additional locations, for any entity type.
  • Bankruptcy cuts both ways. A sole proprietor needs a new number; a corporation or partnership does not.
  • An S election does not require a new number. Neither does an LLC changing its tax election. A new State charter does.
  • Sole proprietors are not merely eligible. Reg. § 301.6109-1(a)(1)(ii)(D) says an individual who is an employer or in a trade or business should use an employer identification number.
  • The responsible party must be a person. Not a parent company, and never a nominee or formation agent.
  • The daily limit is per responsible party. Changing who submits the application does not defeat it.
  • A partnership terminating under IRC § 708(b)(1)(B) keeps its number. The new partnership retains the terminated one's, which is the reverse of the general pattern.

How this has changed

The requirement to keep application information current is comparatively recent, applying to every holder of an employer identification number on or after 1 January 2014. Before it there was no continuing obligation attached to the number at all — an entity applied once and the Service’s record aged with it. The consequence in practice is that the responsible party recorded for many older entities is a person who has long since left, and correcting it is a compliance obligation rather than a housekeeping option.

The rule for partnerships terminating under IRC § 708(b)(1)(B) applies to terminations occurring on or after 9 May 1997, and it survives as a curiosity: the provision that produced those terminations — a sale or exchange of half or more of the interests in capital and profits within twelve months — was repealed for partnership taxable years beginning after 2017, so the technical termination it addressed can no longer occur. The regulation text remains, and material describing technical terminations as a live event is describing repealed law.

Applications by international applicants and the online tool’s availability windows change from time to time; the tool is limited to domestic organisations with a U.S. principal place of business, and everyone else applies by phone, fax or mail. Anything more specific than that is operational rather than legal and should be checked against the current IRS page rather than remembered.

Exam focus

Nearly every question on this topic is a “does this require a new EIN” question, offered as a list of four changes with one that differs from the rest. Learn the four IRS lists as pairs of columns rather than as prose, and note where the same event sits differently for different entity types — bankruptcy is the one that does this most often.

Two further shapes recur. First, a question about who may be named on Form SS-4, where the answer turns on the responsible party being an individual with actual control and on nominees being excluded. Second, a question about whether a sole proprietor may or must have a number, where the trap answer is that a sole proprietor uses only a social security number. Read the option carefully: a sole proprietor with no employees may operate on a social security number, but the regulation directs an individual who is an employer or in a trade or business to use an employer identification number, and the option asserting ineligibility is always wrong.

Check yourself

1. A corporation changes its name, relocates its head office to another State, and elects S corporation status, all in the same year. How many new employer identification numbers does it need?

Answer: none. On the IRS guidance a corporation does not need a new number on changing its name or location or on choosing to be taxed as an S corporation. Each of the three is a change to an existing entity rather than the creation of a new one.

2. A sole proprietor with two employees files for bankruptcy. Does the business need a new employer identification number?

Answer: yes. Declaring bankruptcy is on the IRS list of events for which a sole proprietor needs a new number, because the bankruptcy estate is a separate taxpayer from the individual. The same event does not require a new number for a corporation or a partnership, which continue to exist as the same legal persons.

3. A practitioner needs employer identification numbers for three trusts, all with the same grantor, on the same day. What is the constraint?

Answer: one per day. The limit is one employer identification number per responsible party per day, and for a trust the responsible party is the grantor, owner or trustor. Because the grantor is the same person for all three, only one application will succeed that day; the others must be made on subsequent days.

4. A formation agent incorporates a company on a client’s behalf and holds the sole share until the client’s paperwork is complete. May the agent be named as responsible party on Form SS-4?

Answer: no. That is a nominee — someone given limited authority during formation with little or no control over the entity’s assets — and the IRS guidance states that nominees cannot apply for an employer identification number and should not be listed on Form SS-4. The responsible party must be identified before the application is made.

5. Three partners sell most of the interests in their partnership’s capital and profits to incoming partners over a nine-month period in 2026, and the partnership continues in business. Does it need a new number?

Answer: no, on two independent grounds. A change in ownership that does not terminate the partnership is expressly on the “no new number” side of the IRS guidance. And the technical termination that such a transfer once triggered under IRC § 708(b)(1)(B) was repealed for partnership years beginning after 2017, so nothing terminates here at all.

Change log

  • Initial draft. Sets out the IRC § 6109(a) requirement to supply identifying numbers, the Reg. § 301.6109-1(a)(1)(ii) rules on which number each kind of person uses including the sole proprietor rule at (D), the Form SS-4 application and the Reg. § 301.6109-1(d)(2)(ii) duty to keep application information current, the Reg. § 301.6109-1(d)(2)(iii) rule that a partnership formed on an IRC § 708(b)(1)(B) termination keeps the old number, and the IRS guidance on responsible parties, nominees, the one-per-day limit and when each kind of entity needs a new number.
  • Added a plain-language summary, glossary marks, and typed scenarios.

Related topics