Business Entities · Partnerships
Partnership income, expenses, distributions, and flow-through (e.g.,self- employment income)
tax year · reviewed 2026-08-21 · Draft for N. O. review
Every difficulty in partnership taxation comes from one design decision: the partnership computes and the partner pays. Two consequences follow and both are tested. The computation happens at the entity, so elections, methods and characterisation are settled there and the partner cannot revisit them. But the tax happens at the partner, so items must arrive in a form the partner’s own return can use — which is why so much has to be stated separately rather than folded into a single number.
The rule
No tax at the entity. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 701, read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/701
What must be stated separately. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 702(a), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/702
Why it must be. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 702(b), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/702
How the partnership computes. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 703(a), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/703
Who makes the elections. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 703(b), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/703
How the share is fixed. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 704(a), (b), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/704
The ceiling on losses. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 704(d), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/704
The basis that ceiling runs against. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 705(a), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/705
Liabilities as money. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 752(a), (b), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/752
Distributions. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 731(a), (b), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/731
Self-employment income. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 1402(a)(13), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1402
Current figures
| Item | Rule | Authority |
|---|---|---|
| Separately stated items | Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 702(a), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/702 | IRC § 702(a) |
| Deductions denied to the partnership | Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 703(a), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/703 | IRC § 703(a) |
| Loss limitation | Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 704(d), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/704 | IRC § 704(d) |
| Outside basis | Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 705(a), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/705 | IRC § 705(a) |
| Liabilities | Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 752(a), (b), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/752 | IRC § 752 |
| Distributions | Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 731(a), (b), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/731 | IRC § 731(a) |
How it works in practice
The list of separately stated itemAn item of partnership or S corporation income or deduction that must be reported on its own on each owner's K-1, rather than folded into one overall profit number, because it's taxed differently depending on the owner's own situation.s in IRC § 702(a) is not arbitrary, and learning it as a list is the hard way. Each entry is an item whose treatment on the partner’s return depends on something the partnership cannot know: a capital gain has to meet the partner’s own capital losses, a charitable contribution has to meet the partner’s own contribution limits, a foreign tax has to be tested against the partner’s own foreign tax credit position. Anything whose treatment is fixed at the entity goes into the residual figure — ordinary business income (IRC § 702(a)(8)) — and everything else comes out on its own line.
IRC § 703(a)(2) is the mirror of that. The partnership is denied exactly the deductions it cannot properly compute: personal exemptions, foreign taxes, charitable contributions, the net operating loss deduction, the individual itemized deductions in part VII, and oil and gas depletion. It is not that these are disallowed; they are relocated to the partner.
Character is the point of the whole arrangement, and IRC § 702(b) states it in the strongest possible terms. The character of an item is determined as if the partner had realised it directly from the source the partnership realised it from. A partnership dealing in real estate produces ordinary income for its partners even if a particular partner is an investor in every other respect; a partnership that holds an investment produces capital gain for its partners even if one of them is a dealer.
The basis machinery is where computation actually happens, and IRC § 705(a) should be read as a running account rather than a rule. Basis goes up with the distributive share of taxable income and with tax-exempt income — the second is easy to forget and matters, because otherwise the exempt income would be taxed on a later sale. It goes down with distributions and with the share of losses, and also with non-deductible, non-capitalisable expenditures, which is the mirror of the tax-exempt income rule. It never goes below zero.
IRC § 752 is the provision that makes partnership basis behave unlike any other basis. A partner’s share of partnership liabilities is treated as money contributed, so a partner’s basis includes borrowings the partner never made personally. That is why partners can deduct losses funded by partnership debt, and why a reduction in partnership debt is a deemed cash distribution that can produce gain under IRC § 731(a)(1) without a dollar moving.
The loss limitation in IRC § 704(d) is only the first of several. A loss must survive outside basis, then the at-risk rules, then the passive activity rules, then the excess business loss limitation, in that order. A question that says “the partner’s basis is sufficient” has answered only the first gate.
On self-employment income, note what the statute excludes and what it does not. The exclusion is for a limited partner’s distributive share “as such”; guaranteed payments for services actually rendered are carved back in. A general partner’s distributive share from a trade or business is self-employment income in full, which is the single largest practical difference between a partnership and an S corporation for an owner who works in the business.
Scenarios
The charitable contributionA gift to a qualifying charity that can be deducted if the taxpayer itemizes, subject to limits based on the type of gift and the taxpayer's own income. that could not be deducted at the partnership
A four-partner architecture firm donates $40,000 of cash to a local arts charity in 2026. The bookkeeper deducts it in computing the partnership's ordinary business income, which reduces the ordinary income reported on every Schedule K-1 by the partners' respective shares.
That is wrong twice over. IRC § 703(a)(2)(C) denies the partnership the charitable deduction, so it cannot reduce ordinary business income, and IRC § 702(a)(4) requires the contribution to be stated separately on each K-1. The reason is the partner-level limits: each partner's deduction is tested against their own contribution base and their own itemising position. A partner who takes the standard deduction gets nothing for it, and a partner already at their percentage limit carries it forward. Folding it into ordinary income would have given all four partners a deduction none of them might have been entitled to.
The loss that exceeded basis
Solange holds a 30 percent interest in a partnership. Her outside basis at 1 January 2026 is $22,000, including $9,000 attributable to her share of partnership liabilities. Her distributive share of the 2026 loss is $31,000. During 2026 the partnership repaid debt, reducing her share of liabilities to $4,000.
Two things happen before the loss is tested. The $5,000 reduction in her share of liabilities is a deemed distribution of money under IRC § 752(b), reducing her basis to $17,000 — and because that is still positive, no gain arises under IRC § 731(a)(1). Her loss is then allowed only to the extent of her adjusted basis at the end of the partnership year under IRC § 704(d)(1), so $17,000 is allowed and $14,000 is suspended. The suspended amount is not lost: it becomes deductible in a later year when she has basis again, whether from income, a contribution or an increased share of liabilities.
The dealer and the investment
Two partners form a partnership that acquires a single parcel of undeveloped land and holds it for seven years before selling at a $600,000 gain. One partner is a full-time property developer who treats every parcel they own personally as inventory. The other is a retired teacher.
Both take capital gain. Under IRC § 702(b) the character of the item is determined as if each partner had realised it directly from the source from which the partnership realised it, and the partnership held the parcel as an investment. The developer's personal status is not the source, and it does not convert their share into ordinary income. The result would reverse if the partnership itself were a dealer — then the teacher would take ordinary income, however passive their involvement.
The general partnerA partner who takes part in managing a partnership's business and bears personal liability for the partnership's debts. who wanted to be limited
Ifeoma is one of two general partners in a consulting partnership. Her distributive share of ordinary business income for 2026 is $180,000, and she also receives a guaranteed payment of $60,000 for managing the firm. Her accountant suggests amending the agreement to make her a limited partnerA partner who invests in a partnership but doesn't take part in managing it, and whose liability for the partnership's debts is limited to what they invested. so that the distributive share escapes self-employment tax.
The guaranteed payment is self-employment income whatever her status: IRC § 1402(a)(13) carves back IRC § 707(c) guaranteed payments for services actually rendered, to the extent established to be remuneration for those services. As for the distributive share, the exclusion is for a limited partner "as such", which qualifies the capacity in which the income is earned and not merely the label in the agreement. A partner who continues to manage the firm is not obviously acting as a limited partner in respect of that income. The re-papering is not the straightforward saving it appears to be, and this is contested ground rather than settled planning.
- Separately stated is not optional. The IRC § 702(a) items may not be folded into ordinary business income, and IRC § 703(a)(2) denies the partnership the matching deductions.
- Character is the partnership's, not the partner's. IRC § 702(b) traces to the source the partnership realised the item from.
- Tax-exempt income increases basis. And non-deductible, non-capital expenditures reduce it — both under IRC § 705(a).
- A debt reduction is a cash distribution. IRC § 752(b) can produce gain under IRC § 731(a)(1) with no money moving.
- Basis is the first gate, not the only one. At-risk, passive activity and excess business loss limits all come after IRC § 704(d).
- Suspended losses are not lost. IRC § 704(d)(2) allows them when basis is restored.
- Guaranteed payments are self-employment income regardless. IRC § 1402(a)(13) carves them back in even for a limited partner.
How this has changed
The architecture of subchapter K has been stable since 1954 and none of the provisions above has been amended recently. What has changed is the stack of limitations that a partnership loss must now pass through after IRC § 704(d). The excess business loss limitation was made permanent by the 2025 Act, so a non-corporate partner whose aggregate business losses exceed the threshold defers the excess indefinitely even where basis, at-risk and passive activity rules are all satisfied. Any material presenting IRC § 704(d) as the last gate is describing a shorter list than the one that now applies.
The self-employment treatment of a limited partner’s distributive share is the live area, and it is live in litigation rather than in legislation. IRC § 1402(a)(13) has not been amended, and the words “limited partner, as such” have carried their weight unchanged since 1977. What has moved is how firmly the Service and the courts read “as such” as a functional test about the capacity in which the income was earned, rather than a formal test about the label in the partnership agreement. Advice that treats a limited partnership interest as automatically outside self-employment income should be given with that uncertainty stated.
Exam focus
The most common shape gives a list of partnership items and asks which are separately stated. Work from the principle rather than the list: an item is separately stated if its treatment depends on facts about the partner. Capital gains, IRC § 1231 items, charitable contributions, qualified dividends, foreign taxes and credits all qualify; wages paid to employees, rent paid, and depreciation on business assets do not.
The second shape gives a partner’s basis, a share of losses, and sometimes a change in liabilities, and asks how much loss is deductible. Order matters: adjust basis for liabilities and distributions first, then apply IRC § 704(d), then note that the excess is suspended rather than lost.
Watch for questions where a partnership distribution exceeds basis. The answer is gain under IRC § 731(a)(1) treated as gain from the sale or exchange of the partnership interest — and remember that a reduction in the partner’s share of liabilities counts as a distribution of money for this purpose.
Check yourself
1. A partnership’s books show ordinary business income of $300,000 after deducting $20,000 of charitable contributions and $15,000 of long-term capital gain included in revenue. What ordinary business income should appear on the Schedules K-1 in aggregate?
Answer: $305,000. The charitable contribution must be added back, because IRC § 703(a)(2)(C) denies the partnership the deduction and IRC § 702(a)(4) requires it to be stated separately. The capital gain must be removed, because IRC § 702(a)(2) requires it to be stated separately. Ordinary business income is $300,000 plus $20,000 less $15,000, and the other two items travel on their own lines.
2. A partner’s outside basis is $40,000 at the end of the partnership year, and their distributive share of the year’s loss is $58,000. How much may they deduct, subject to no other limitation?
Answer: $40,000, with $18,000 suspended. IRC § 704(d)(1) allows the loss only to the extent of the adjusted basis of the interest at the end of the partnership year in which the loss occurred, and IRC § 704(d)(2) allows the excess in a later year. The at-risk, passive activity and excess business loss rules are then applied to the $40,000 in turn.
3. A partnership refinances, reducing a partner’s share of liabilities by $25,000. The partner’s outside basis immediately before the refinancing is $9,000. What is the consequence?
Answer: $16,000 of gain. The decrease in the partner’s share of liabilities is treated as a distribution of money under IRC § 752(b), basis is reduced to zero rather than below it, and the excess of the deemed distribution over basis is gain under IRC § 731(a)(1), treated as gain from the sale or exchange of the partnership interest. No cash was distributed.
4. A partnership receives $8,000 of tax-exempt municipal bond interest and pays a $3,000 fine that is not deductible. How do these affect a 50 percent partner’s outside basis?
Answer: up $4,000 and down $1,500, for a net increase of $2,500. IRC § 705(a)(1)(B) increases basis by the distributive share of income exempt from tax, and IRC § 705(a)(2)(B) decreases it by the share of expenditures that are neither deductible nor properly chargeable to capital account. Both are necessary so that the exempt income is never taxed and the non-deductible expense is never deducted on a later sale.
5. A limited partner receives a $75,000 distributive share and a $30,000 guaranteed payment for services actually rendered to the partnership. What is subject to self-employment tax?
Answer: the $30,000. IRC § 1402(a)(13) excludes a limited partner’s distributive share as such, but expressly does not exclude IRC § 707(c) guaranteed payments for services actually rendered to the extent established to be remuneration for those services. Whether the $75,000 is genuinely excluded also depends on the partner acting as a limited partner in respect of it, which is a question of capacity rather than of the agreement’s wording.
Change log
- Initial draft. Sets out the IRC § 701 absence of entity tax, the IRC § 702(a) separately stated items and the § 702(b) conduit rule for character, the § 703(a) computation of partnership taxable income and the deductions denied to it, the § 703(b) allocation of elections between partnership and partner, the § 704(a) and (b) determination of distributive share and the § 704(d) basis limitation on losses, the § 705(a) outside basis mechanics and the § 752 treatment of liabilities as contributions and distributions, the § 731 recognition rules on distributions, and the IRC § 1402(a)(13) limited partner exclusion from self-employment income.
- Added a plain-language summary, glossary marks, and typed scenarios.
Related topics
- Basis of partner's interest 2.1.2.e
- Partner's dealings with partnership (e.g., exchange of property, guaranteed payments) 2.1.2.c
- Partnerships and qualified joint ventures (QJV) 2.1.1.b
- Filing requirements, due dates, penalties, and audit notice requirements 2.1.2.i
- Family partnerships 2.1.2.b
- Contribution of property and/or services to partnership (e.g., partnership's basis, property subject to indebtedness) 2.1.2.d
- Disposition of partner's interest 2.1.2.f
- Partnership formation (e.g., partnership agreement, general vs. limited partners, capital contributions) 2.1.2.g
- Dissolution of partnership (e.g., sale, death of partner) 2.1.2.h
- Partnership cancellation of debt 2.1.2.j
- Partnership level audit and opt-out 2.1.2.k
- Income, expenses and separately stated items 2.1.5.c
- Qualified business income (QBI) (SSTB, calculations, phase out, UBIA) 2.2.2.l
- Pass-through activity (e.g., K-1, separately stated items, non-deductible expenses) 2.2.4.f