TaxEar

TaxEarPart 2Analysis of financial records

Business Tax Preparation · Analysis of financial records

Depreciation recovery (e.g., recapture, IRC Section 280F)

Verification 2026 Verified
tax year · reviewed 2026-08-21 · Draft for N. O. review
When a business deducts part of an asset's cost each year, that deduction lowers the asset's basis. Basis is what the asset is treated as having cost for tax purposes. Sell the asset later, and the gain is measured against that lower basis. Part of the sale price the owner thought was tax-free growth turns out to be the deduction coming back. It is usually taxed at regular rates, not the lower rates for a long-term gain. This affects any business or person who owns property that has been depreciated, such as equipment, a car, or a building. It does not matter whether they claimed the deduction each year. It decides how much of a later sale counts as regular income instead of a lower-taxed gain. It can also apply when business use drops, even with no sale at all.

Depreciation is a loan against the sale price. Every dollar reduces basis, and reduced basis means more gain later — usually gain taxed at ordinary rates rather than capital ones. What makes the topic difficult is that the loan is called in at three different moments by three different mechanisms, and only one of them is a sale.

The rule

The basis falls whether you took the deduction or not. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 1016(a)(2), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1016 (IRC § 1016(a)(2)). This is the proposition everything else rests on. A taxpayer who forgot to depreciate an asset does not have a higher basis on sale; it has the same basis and a lost deduction.

Recapture on sale, personal property. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 1245(a)(1), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1245 (IRC § 1245(a)(1)), computed against recomputed basis: Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 1245(a)(2)(A) and (B), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1245 (IRC § 1245(a)(2)). Note both extensions there — allowed or allowable, and allowed to the taxpayer or to any other person, which is how recapture follows property through a carryover-basis transfer. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 1245(a)(3), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1245 (IRC § 1245(a)(3)).

Recapture on sale, real property. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 1250(a)(1)(A), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1250 (IRC § 1250(a)(1)). Real property has been on straight-line recovery since 1986, so additional depreciation is usually nil and § 1250 recaptures nothing — but the gain does not become ordinary capital gain either: Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 1(h)(6)(A), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1 (IRC § 1(h)(6)).

What is left goes to section 1231. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 1231(b)(1), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1231 (IRC § 1231(b)(1)), Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 1231(a)(1) and (a)(2), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1231 (IRC § 1231(a)(1)), subject to Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 1231(c)(1) and (c)(2), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1231 (IRC § 1231(c)(1)).

Recapture without a sale, listed property. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 280F(d)(4), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/280F (IRC § 280F(d)(4)); the narrower category is Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 280F(d)(5)(A), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/280F (IRC § 280F(d)(5)(A)). The test that matters is Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 280F(d)(6)(B) and (C), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/280F (IRC § 280F(d)(6)). Fall below the line and two things happen at once: {fig:vehicle.280F_fifty_percent} (IRC § 280F(b)(1)) and {fig:vehicle.280F_recapture} (IRC § 280F(b)(2)(A)), the amount being Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 280F(b)(2)(B), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/280F.

Recapture without a sale, expensing. Verified 2026-08-21Reg. § 1.179-1(e)(1), opened at law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/26/1.179-1; IRC § 179(d)(10), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/179 (Reg. § 1.179-1(e)(1); IRC § 179(d)(10)).

And the annual ceiling on an automobile. {fig:vehicle.280F_bonus_2026} (Rev. Proc. 2026-15 Table 1); where no IRC § 168(k) deduction applies, {fig:vehicle.280F_nobonus_2026} (Table 2). {fig:vehicle.280F_unrecovered} (IRC § 280F(a)(1)(B)).

Current figures

ItemFigureAuthority
Allowed or allowableVerified 2026-08-21IRC § 1016(a)(2), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1016IRC § 1016(a)(2)
Recomputed basisVerified 2026-08-21IRC § 1245(a)(2)(A) and (B), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1245IRC § 1245(a)(2)
Qualified business useVerified 2026-08-21IRC § 280F(d)(6)(B) and (C), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/280FIRC § 280F(d)(6)
Excess depreciationVerified 2026-08-21IRC § 280F(b)(2)(B), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/280FIRC § 280F(b)(2)(B)
Expensing recaptureVerified 2026-08-21Reg. § 1.179-1(e)(1), opened at law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/26/1.179-1; IRC § 179(d)(10), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/179Reg. § 1.179-1(e)(1)
2026 automobile caps, with § 168(k){fig:vehicle.280F_bonus_2026}Rev. Proc. 2026-15 Table 1
2026 automobile caps, without{fig:vehicle.280F_nobonus_2026}Rev. Proc. 2026-15 Table 2

How it works in practice

Recapture is a character rule, not an amount rule. It never creates gain — it takes gain that already exists and reclassifies it from capital to ordinary, up to the depreciation taken. That is why an asset sold at a loss produces no recapture however much depreciation it absorbed, and why an asset sold above original cost recaptures only up to the depreciation, the excess running to § 1231.

Work a disposition in a fixed order. Amount realised; adjusted basis, reduced by depreciation allowed but not below the allowable floor; the difference. A loss stops there — § 1231 loss, ordinary. A gain goes on: convert to ordinary income, under § 1245 or § 1250, as much as the depreciation taken. Anything above that is § 1231 gain, which nets with the year’s other § 1231 items and is recharacterised as ordinary to the extent of non-recaptured net § 1231 losses of the previous five years.

Section 1245 and section 1250 recapture different things. Section 1245 recaptures all depreciation, so on personal property the entire deduction comes back as ordinary income to the extent of gain. Section 1250 recaptures only additional depreciation — the excess over straight line — which for property placed in service after 1986 is normally zero. So a building sold at a gain generates no § 1250 recapture and a large unrecaptured § 1250 gain instead, taxed at its own rate.

The listed property rules bite before any sale. The § 280F(b) mechanism is the one candidates most often miss, because nothing is disposed of. A vehicle that went into service well above the line and drops below it in year three obliges the taxpayer to include the excess depreciation in income in year three and to switch to the alternative depreciation system for that year and all later ones. The comparison is against what the alternative system would have allowed from the start, not against zero.

The 5-percent owner exception makes use look worse than it is. Qualified business use excludes use leased to a 5-percent owner or provided as compensation to one, unless the value is included in that person’s income and withheld on. So an owner-manager driving a company car is not generating qualified business use for the predominant-use test unless the personal use is run through payroll — the fact pattern that pushes a vehicle below the line without anyone noticing.

Expensing recapture is computed differently from listed property recapture. Reg. § 1.179-1(e)(1) compares what was expensed against what § 168 would have allowed had the election never been made — through the year of recapture, not just the prior years. And it applies whether or not the deduction actually reduced tax, so a taxpayer with losses in the year of the election still recaptures in full.

Read all of this off the balance sheet before it is a problem. Accumulated depreciation, the depreciation schedule and the asset accounts together show which assets carry a large ordinary income exposure on sale, which listed property is drifting toward the line, and whether last year’s disposals had their gain computed at all.

Scenarios

The deduction that was never taken

Ferndale Printing bought a folder in year one for $90,000 and, through an oversight, claimed no depreciation. It sells the machine in year five for $70,000, and the preparer computes a loss of $20,000 against the $90,000 cost.

That is wrong. IRC § 1016(a)(2) reduces basis by depreciation allowed but not less than the amount allowable, so the folder’s basis has fallen by what Ferndale could have claimed even though it claimed nothing. On a five-year MACRS schedule the allowable depreciation through year five runs to most of the cost, so the sale produces a substantial gain rather than a loss.

Worse, the gain is ordinary. IRC § 1245(a)(2)(A) computes recomputed basis by adding back depreciationDeducting the cost of a business or income-producing asset gradually over its useful life, rather than all in the year it was bought, because the asset keeps providing value for years afterward. allowed or allowable, and the relief in subparagraph (B) — adding back only what was allowed — is available only where the taxpayer establishes by adequate records that less was allowed than allowable. Ferndale can establish that, limiting the add-back; but it cannot undo the basis reduction under § 1016(a)(2), which carries no such relief. The lost deduction stays lost and the basis stays reduced.

The car that crossed the line

Locke Surveying places a car — listed propertyProperty, such as a vehicle, that's often used for both business and personal purposes. It comes with extra recordkeeping requirements and stricter depreciation rules to prevent claiming personal use as business use. — in service in year one at 78 percent qualified business use and takes depreciation accordingly. In year four the principal reduces her driving and business use falls to 41 percent.

Two consequences arrive together in year four. IRC § 280F(b)(1) requires depreciation for year four and every later year to be computed under the alternative depreciation system. And IRC § 280F(b)(2)(A) requires the excess depreciation to be included in gross income in year four — being, under subparagraph (B), the depreciation allowable for years one through three over what would have been allowable had the car never been predominantly used in a qualified business use.

Note what the test is not: not whether business use fell relative to last year, and not a proportional adjustment. It is a cliff at the halfway mark, and crossing it once triggers the full catch-up. Note too that had the principal been a 5-percent owner using the car as compensation without the value being included in her income, the use would never have counted as qualified at all.

Two buildings, two answers

Ashcombe Estates sells two properties in one year. The first, an office building placed in service in 1979 under an accelerated method, produces gain of $600,000 with additional depreciation of $140,000. The second, a warehouse placed in service in 2011 and depreciated straight line, produces gain of $450,000 with accumulated depreciation of $180,000.

The office building generates § 1250 recaptureTreating part of the gain on a sale as ordinary income rather than capital gain, because a deduction — usually depreciation — taken earlier turned out to be more generous than the asset's actual drop in value.: additional depreciation exists because an accelerated method was used, so the applicable percentage of the lower of that additional depreciation or the gain is ordinary income.

The warehouse generates none, because straight-line depreciation produces no additional depreciation. But the $180,000 is not ordinary capital gain either — it is unrecaptured section 1250 gain, the long-term capital gain that would have been ordinary had § 1250(b)(1) counted all depreciation, and it carries its own rate. The remaining $270,000 is § 1231 gain. Same asset class, same year, three different characters across two sales.

The expensing election undone

Trenholm Design expenses a $60,000 machine under the Section 179 deductionAn election letting a business currently deduct the full cost of qualifying equipment in the year it's put to use, instead of depreciating it over several years. in year one, a year in which a loss carryforward meant the election produced no current tax saving. In year three the machine moves to the owner’s personal workshop and ceases to be used predominantly in the business.

Recapture applies in year three. Reg. § 1.179-1(e)(1) measures the benefit as the excess of the amount expensed over what IRC § 168 would have allowed for years one and two and year three had the election never been made, and says expressly that it applies regardless of whether that excess reduced tax liability. The absence of a saving in year one is irrelevant.

The amount recaptured is added to basis, so the machine is not depreciated twice; only the timing changes. And this is a separate mechanism from § 280F: the machine is not listed property, so nothing here turns on the predominant-use cliff or on the alternative depreciation system.

Traps

Recapture cannot exceed gain, and cannot create it. An asset sold at a loss produces no recapture however much depreciation it absorbed. Both § 1245(a)(1) and § 1250(a)(1) take the lower of the depreciation figure and the excess of amount realised over adjusted basis.

Section 1250 recaptures additional depreciation, not all depreciation. For property placed in service after 1986 and depreciated straight line, the § 1250 recapture is normally nil. Treating a building like § 1245 property overstates the ordinary income substantially.

Unrecaptured section 1250 gain is not recapture. It is long-term capital gain with its own rate, computed under IRC § 1(h)(6), and it survives even where § 1250 itself recaptures nothing. The names are close enough to be a reliable distractor.

The § 280F(b) test is qualified business use, not total business use. Use leased to or provided as compensation to a 5-percent owner is excluded unless the value is included in income and withheld on, so an owner’s car can fail the predominant-use test at a business-use percentage that looks comfortably above half.

Section 179 recapture needs no sale and does not care whether the deduction saved tax. Reg. § 1.179-1(e)(1) triggers on the property ceasing to be used predominantly in a trade or business, and reaches the whole benefit regardless of whether the excess reduced liability.

How this has changed

The most consequential recent movement is not in the recapture provisions, which have been stable, but in how much there is to recapture. Pub. L. 119-21 § 70301 made the IRC § 168(k) additional first year depreciation permanent at the full statutory rate and repealed the phase-down, so an asset acquired and placed in service after 19 January 2025 typically carries a basis of zero from its first year. Every dollar of a later sale price is therefore gain, and on § 1245 property every dollar up to original cost is ordinary income. The recapture rules did not change; the exposure they create grew.

The interaction is visible on the automobile side. Rev. Proc. 2026-15 publishes two tables for cars placed in service in 2026 that differ only in the first year, and only by {fig:vehicle.280F_bonus_uplift} — and the revenue procedure states that Table 1 applies whether the § 168(k) deduction comes from the amended provision or from former § 168(k), whose applicable percentage for property acquired before 20 January 2025 has phased down. Two statutory routes, one table.

Section 1250 has been quietly emptying since 1986, when the Tax Reform Act put real property on straight-line recovery. Additional depreciation can now arise only on property placed in service before that change or on the narrow categories still eligible for accelerated methods, so the practical question on almost every building is unrecaptured section 1250 gain rather than § 1250 recapture.

Nothing in the post-2024 legislation alters IRC § 280F(b), IRC § 1016(a)(2) or the § 1245 mechanics.

Exam focus

Start every disposition question with IRC § 1016(a)(2). The allowed-or-allowable rule is the most productive proposition here and appears constantly as a fact pattern in which the taxpayer under-claimed or forgot to claim.

Know the order: amount realised, adjusted basis, gain or loss, recapture, § 1231 — and that recapture is capped by gain and never creates it.

Keep § 1245 and § 1250 apart by what each recaptures — all depreciation against additional depreciation — and keep unrecaptured section 1250 gain apart from both. Expect a question that offers § 1250 recapture as a distractor on straight-line property.

For § 280F, memorise the three tests as a sequence: is it listed property, is it a passenger automobile, and is more than half the use qualified business use. Be ready to explain that falling below the line does two things at once — ADS prospectively and excess depreciation into income now — and that excess depreciation is measured against the ADS amount, not against zero.

Finally, distinguish the two non-sale recaptures. Section 280F(b) applies to listed property on the predominant-use cliff; Reg. § 1.179-1(e) applies to expensed property, computes its amount differently, and operates whether or not the original deduction saved any tax.

Check yourself

1. A machine costing $120,000 has accumulated depreciation of $85,000 and is sold for $150,000. How is the gain characterised?

Answer: Adjusted basis is $35,000, so the gain is $115,000. IRC § 1245(a)(1) makes ordinary the excess of the lower of recomputed basis ($120,000) or amount realised ($150,000) over adjusted basis — $120,000 less $35,000, giving $85,000 of ordinary income, exactly the depreciation taken. The remaining $30,000 is gain above original cost, which § 1245 does not reach: IRC § 1231 gain, netting with the year’s other § 1231 items subject to the five-year lookback.

2. A sole proprietor never depreciated a $40,000 trailer used in the business for six years, and sells it for $18,000. Is there a loss?

Answer: Almost certainly not. IRC § 1016(a)(2) reduces basis by depreciation allowed but not below the amount allowable, so the trailer’s basis has fallen by the MACRS depreciation that could have been claimed regardless of the failure to claim it. Over six years on a five-year recovery period that is the whole cost, leaving a basis near zero and a gain near $18,000. IRC § 1245(a)(2)(B) lets the proprietor add back only what was actually allowed, if it can establish that by adequate records — limiting recomputed basis and hence the ordinary income. The basis reduction itself is not undone.

3. A car is placed in service at 65 percent business use, of which 20 points consist of use by a 5-percent owner as compensation with no amount included in her income. Does the car qualify for MACRS in year one?

Answer: No. IRC § 280F(d)(6)(C) excludes from qualified business use any use of property provided as compensation for services by a 5-percent owner unless an amount is included in that person’s gross income and, where required, withheld on. Stripping out those 20 points leaves qualified business use below the halfway mark, so IRC § 280F(b)(1) puts the car on the alternative depreciation system from year one. There is no excess depreciation to recapture: § 280F(b)(2)(A) requires as its first condition that the property was predominantly used in a qualified business use in the year it was placed in service, and it never was.

4. A warehouse placed in service in 2012 and depreciated straight line is sold at a $500,000 gain, with $210,000 of accumulated depreciation. How much is recaptured under IRC § 1250?

Answer: None. Section 1250 recaptures the applicable percentage of additional depreciation, meaning the excess of depreciation taken over straight line, and a taxpayer that used straight line has no additional depreciation. But the answer does not end there: $210,000 is unrecaptured section 1250 gain under IRC § 1(h)(6), long-term capital gain taxed at its own rate, and the remaining $290,000 is § 1231 gain. A response of “no recapture, all capital gain at the ordinary long-term rate” is the mistake the question is testing for.

5. Why does IRC § 1245(a)(2)(A) add back depreciation allowed to any other person?

Answer: To stop recapture being washed out by a carryover-basis transfer. Where a taxpayer takes property with a basis determined by reference to the transferor’s — a gift, a contribution to a controlled corporation, a like-kind exchange — the recapture potential built up in the transferor’s hands would otherwise disappear, since the transferee took none of that depreciation itself. Adding back depreciation allowed or allowable to any other person makes recapture follow the property, which is why a question can turn on the history of an asset the current owner never depreciated.

Change log

  • Initial draft. Sets out the IRC § 1016(a)(2) allowed-or-allowable rule and the IRC § 1245(a)(2) recomputed basis that follows from it, the IRC § 1245 and § 1250 recapture provisions with their different mechanics, the IRC § 280F(b) drop to the alternative depreciation system and its excess depreciation recapture when qualified business use falls to half or less, the Reg. § 1.179-1(e)(1) recapture of an expensing election, and the 2026 IRC § 280F(a) limitation tables from Rev. Proc. 2026-15.
  • Added a plain-language summary, glossary marks, and typed the existing scenarios.

Related topics