TaxEar

TaxEarPart 2Rental Property

Specialized Returns and Taxpayers · Rental property

Commercial rentals versus residential rentals

Verification 2026 Verified
tax year · reviewed 2026-08-21 · Draft for N. O. review
This page explains how the tax law decides whether a rental building counts as residential or commercial. It matters for anyone who owns rental real estate, especially a mixed building with both apartments and stores. It does not turn on what the building looks like or how it is used day to day. The test instead looks at where the rent money comes from: mostly from homes, or mostly from businesses. That single test decides how many years it takes to deduct the building's cost, and it can even change from one year to the next if the mix of tenants changes. The page also covers how renovations to the two types of buildings are treated very differently.

Two rental buildings can look identical and be depreciated over periods twelve years apart. The classification is not architectural — it is a test on the composition of the rent, applied year by year, and a building can cross the line without a brick moving.

The rule

The test (IRC § 168(e)(2)(A)(i)). Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 168, read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/168 Eighty percent of gross rental income, not eighty percent of floor area and not eighty percent of units. A mixed-use building with ground-floor shops paying high commercial rents and flats above can be nonresidential even where most of the square footage is residential.

What is a dwelling unit. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 168, read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/168 The transient exclusion is why a hotel and a short-stay apartment block are nonresidential real property, and the owner-occupation rule is why a landlord living in one flat of a four-flat building includes the rental value of their own flat in the test.

The residual. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 168, read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/168 Nonresidential real property is defined by exclusion, so anything that is IRC § 1250 property and fails the 80 percent test lands there — provided its class life is at least 27.5 years.

The periods. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 168, read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/168 Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 168, read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/168 Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 168, read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/168 Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 168, read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/168

Improvements are treated asymmetrically. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 168, read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/168 Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 168, read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/168 There is no residential counterpart. An interior improvement to an apartment building is generally depreciated over the building’s own 27.5 years, while the same work in an office building is 15-year property eligible for bonus depreciation and, within limits, for the Section 179 deductionAn election letting a business currently deduct the full cost of qualifying equipment in the year it's put to use, instead of depreciating it over several years..

The interest election has a cost here too. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 168, read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/168 Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 168, read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/168

Current figures

Item2026
Residential rental propertyVerified 2026-08-21IRC § 168, read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/168
Dwelling unitVerified 2026-08-21IRC § 168, read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/168
Nonresidential real propertyVerified 2026-08-21IRC § 168, read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/168
Recovery periodsVerified 2026-08-21IRC § 168, read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/168
Alternative depreciation systemVerified 2026-08-21IRC § 168, read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/168
MethodVerified 2026-08-21IRC § 168, read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/168
ConventionVerified 2026-08-21IRC § 168, read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/168
Qualified improvement propertyVerified 2026-08-21IRC § 168, read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/168
Electing real property trade or businessVerified 2026-08-21IRC § 168, read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/168
Separate ADS electionVerified 2026-08-21IRC § 168, read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/168

How it works in practice

Run the 80 percent test on the actual rent roll each year, not once at acquisition. The statute frames it as a test “for the taxable year,” so a building whose commercial tenancies grow can shift from residential to nonresidential. In practice the Service and taxpayers alike treat the classification as fixed at placement in service for a building whose use has not materially changed, but a genuine change in the mix — the ground floor let to a restaurant at triple the residential rate — is a change in classification and needs to be handled, generally as a change in accounting method rather than a simple re-computation.

Include the taxpayer’s own occupancy in the denominator and the numerator. IRC § 168(e)(2)(A)(ii)(II) requires the rental value of any portion the taxpayer occupies to be included in gross rental income. That usually helps — an owner living in one unit of a small block is contributing residential rental value to the numerator — but it has to be quantified rather than ignored.

For improvements, identify the building’s classification before deciding how to recover the cost. The qualified improvement propertyAn improvement to the interior of a nonresidential building, given its own depreciation treatment separate from the building itself. class in IRC § 168(e)(3)(E)(vii) applies only to an interior improvement to a building which is nonresidential real property. Work on an apartment building’s interior is generally an improvement to 27.5-year property, though components that are properly IRC § 1245 personal property — appliances, carpeting, removable fixtures — are separable and recovered over five or seven years, which is what makes a cost segregation study worth commissioning on a residential building.

Weigh the IRC § 163(j)(7)(B) election as a long-term commitment. It escapes the business interest limitation, and it puts every building the business holds onto the alternative depreciation system — 40 years for commercial, 30 for residential, 20 for qualified improvement property — irrevocably. On a heavily leveraged commercial portfolio the interest relief usually wins; on a lightly leveraged one it rarely does.

The building that changed class

An investor owns a four-storey building. Originally all four floors were flats and the building was plainly residential rental property, depreciated over 27.5 years. In 2026 the ground floor is converted and let to a firm of solicitors on a commercial lease at $96,000 a year. The three residential floors produce $84,000 of rent between them.

The 80 percent test now fails badly. Rental income from dwelling units is $84,000 out of $180,000, or about 47 percent — well below the 80 percent that IRC § 168(e)(2)(A)(i) requires. The building is nonresidential real property for the year, recovered over 39 years. Note what does not happen: the prior years’ depreciation is not recomputed, and the change is prospective. Note also what the conversion work itself is. Interior improvements to a building which is nonresidential real property are qualified improvement property under IRC § 168(e)(6) unless attributable to enlargement, an elevator or escalator, or the internal structural framework — so the fit-out is 15-year property while the building it sits inside is 39-year property.

The short-stay block

An owner builds a twenty-unit block of serviced apartments. Each unit is a self-contained flat with a kitchen. Fourteen of the twenty are let on stays of a week or less through booking platforms; the other six are on twelve-month leases. All twenty produce broadly similar annual revenue.

The building is nonresidential real property, at 39 years. IRC § 168(e)(2)(A)(ii)(I) excludes from “dwelling unit” a unit in a hotel, motel or other establishment more than one-half of the units in which are used on a transient basis. Fourteen of twenty is more than half, so none of the twenty units is a dwelling unit — the exclusion operates on the establishment, not unit by unit. Rental income from dwelling units is therefore zero, the 80 percent test fails, and the whole building is on 39 years. Had the mix been nine transient and eleven long-let, the establishment test would not be met, all twenty would be dwelling units, and the building would be residential at 27.5 years. Five units is the difference between two recovery periods.

Two identical refurbishments

A taxpayer owns an office building and an apartment building of similar size. In the same year she spends $400,000 on each: new interior partitions, lighting, flooring and finishes throughout, with no enlargement, no lift work and nothing touching the structural frame.

The office building’s work is qualified improvement property — an improvement to an interior portion of a building which is nonresidential real property, placed in service after the building was — so it is 15-year property under IRC § 168(e)(3)(E)(vii), straight line, and eligible for bonus depreciation and for IRC § 179 expensing within the dollar and income limits. The apartment building’s work is not: IRC § 168(e)(6) requires the building to be nonresidential real property. Those costs are recovered over 27.5 years, except to the extent components are properly IRC § 1245 personal property identifiable through a cost segregation study. Same money, same work, radically different timing.

Eighty percent of income, not of space or units. IRC § 168(e)(2)(A)(i) tests gross rental income from dwelling units against gross rental income from the building. A building that is mostly flats by area can be nonresidential if the commercial rents dominate the rent roll.

The transient test is about the establishment, not the unit. More than half the units used on a transient basis takes every unit out of the dwelling unit definition, including the ones on long leases. It is an all-or-nothing test applied to the building.

Qualified improvement property has no residential equivalent. The definition in IRC § 168(e)(6) is limited to a building which is nonresidential real property. Advice treating an apartment refurbishment as 15-year property is wrong, and the error is expensive because it also carries an incorrect bonus depreciation claim.

The mid-month convention applies to both classes. IRC § 168(d)(2) puts residential rental, nonresidential real property and railroad grading or tunnel bore on the mid-month convention. A building placed in service in December gets half a month of depreciation, not half a year, and the mid-quarter convention never applies to it.

How this has changed

The 39-year period for nonresidential real property dates from the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993, which lengthened it from 31.5 years for property placed in service after 12 May 1993. The 27.5-year residential period has been unchanged since the Tax Reform Act of 1986. A building placed in service between 1987 and 1993 may still be running on 31.5 years, which matters when computing recaptureTreating part of the gain on a sale as ordinary income rather than capital gain, because a deduction — usually depreciation — taken earlier turned out to be more generous than the asset's actual drop in value. on a sale.

Qualified improvement property was the subject of the best-known drafting error in recent tax legislation. Pub. L. 115-97 § 13204 consolidated three predecessor categories into one and intended a 15-year period, but the statutory text omitted it, leaving qualified improvement property at 39 years and outside bonus depreciation. The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act corrected it retroactively to property placed in service after 31 December 2017, and taxpayers who had capitalised over 39 years in the interim were able to change method.

The alternative depreciation period for residential rental property was shortened from 40 years to 30 by Pub. L. 115-97 § 13204(a)(3), and the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 extended the 30-year period to residential property placed in service before 2018 and held by an electing real property trade or business. That correction mattered a great deal to leveraged residential portfolios making the IRC § 163(j)(7)(B) election.

Bonus depreciation was restored to the full rate and made permanent by Pub. L. 119-21 § 70301, which also repealed the phase-down schedule. For a commercial landlord that makes the qualified improvement property classification more valuable than at any point since 2017.

Exam focus

Know the 80 percent gross rental income test and that it is income-based. Know the dwelling unit definition and the more-than-half-transient establishment exclusion.

Know the four periods as two pairs: 27.5 and 39 under the general system, 30 and 40 under the alternative system. Know that both classes use straight line and the mid-month convention.

Know that qualified improvement property exists only for nonresidential buildings, that it is 15-year property, and that the IRC § 163(j)(7)(B) election forces the alternative system on every building the electing business holds.

Check yourself

1. A building’s rent roll is $210,000 from flats and $60,000 from a ground-floor shop. Which class?

Answer: Nonresidential real property, 39 years. Rental income from dwelling units is $210,000 out of $270,000, or about 77.8 percent, which is below the 80 percent that IRC § 168(e)(2)(A)(i) requires. The building is therefore not residential rental property despite the flats supplying most of the rent. The arithmetic is close enough to be worth doing rather than eyeballing, and this fact pattern is designed to punish the eyeball.

2. A landlord occupies one of five identical flats in a building he owns and lets the other four. There are no commercial tenants. Does his occupancy affect the classification?

Answer: It affects the computation but not the outcome. IRC § 168(e)(2)(A)(ii)(II) requires the rental value of the owner-occupied portion to be included in gross rental income from the building. Here that value is itself rental value of a dwelling unit, so it enters both the numerator and the denominator and the ratio stays at 100 percent. Residential rental property, 27.5 years.

3. An owner spends $250,000 replacing the lift in an office building. Is it qualified improvement property?

Answer: No. IRC § 168(e)(6)(B)(ii) excludes any improvement attributable to an elevator or escalator from the definition. The lift is a structural component of the building and is recovered over the building’s 39 years. The same result follows for enlargement work and for anything touching the internal structural framework.

4. A real property trade or business makes the IRC § 163(j)(7)(B) election. It holds an office building, an apartment block and recently completed interior improvements to the office. What periods apply?

Answer: 40 years for the office building, 30 years for the apartment block and 20 years for the qualified improvement property, all under the alternative depreciation system by operation of IRC § 168(g)(1)(F) and (g)(8). The election is irrevocable, so those periods apply for as long as the business holds the assets.

5. A twelve-unit building has seven units let nightly to tourists and five on annual leases. Which class?

Answer: Nonresidential real property, 39 years. Seven of twelve units are used on a transient basis, which is more than half, so IRC § 168(e)(2)(A)(ii)(I) takes the whole establishment out of the dwelling unit definition. Rental income from dwelling units is nil, the 80 percent test cannot be met, and the five long-let units do not save it.

Change log

  • Initial draft. Sets out the IRC § 168(e)(2)(A) 80 percent gross rental income test that decides residential status, the dwelling unit definition excluding transient establishments, the 27.5 and 39 year periods with their 30 and 40 year alternative depreciation system counterparts, the mid-month convention, and the asymmetry that qualified improvement property exists only for nonresidential buildings.
  • Added a plain-language summary, glossary marks, and typed scenarios.

Related topics