TaxEar

TaxEarPart 2Retirement plans

Specialized Returns and Taxpayers · Retirement plans

Plans for self-employed persons (e.g., SEP and SIMPLE)

Verification 2026 Verified
tax year · reviewed 2026-08-21 · Draft for N. O. review
SEP and SIMPLE plans are two easy retirement options built for small firms and self-employed people who do not want to run a full 401(k). They work in very different ways, though. A SEP is paid for by the employer alone, and the worker has no say and puts in nothing. A SIMPLE is built around the worker choosing to set aside part of their own pay, which the employer must then match or add to. Because the two plans work so differently, they also use totally different rules for which workers must be let in. This page walks through both sets of rules side by side.

Both plans exist because a small employer will not run a 401(k), and both are built on individual retirement accounts rather than a trust. That is where the similarity ends. A SEP takes only employer money and the employee has no election at all; a SIMPLE is built on the employee’s salary reduction election and the employer’s obligation to match it. Every eligibility, timing and ceiling difference follows from that one fact.

The rule

Who must be covered in a SEP (IRC § 408(k)(2)). Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 408, read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/408 Verified 2026-08-21Notice 2025-67, 2026 amounts relating to retirement plans and IRAs, read at irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/n-25-67.pdf The three-of-five test counts any service in a year, not a full year of service, so a seasonal worker who appears for three consecutive summers has satisfied it.

How much, and to whom. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 408, read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/408 Verified 2026-08-21IRC §§ 404(h) and 415(c), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/404 and /415 The employee makes no contribution and has no election. There is no salary reduction in a SEP, so an employee who wants to save more must use a separate IRA of their own.

Vesting in a SEP is not a schedule. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 408, read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/408 Because the money goes into the employee’s own IRA and the employer may not restrict withdrawals, vesting is immediate as a structural matter rather than as a plan term.

Who may sponsor a SIMPLE. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 408, read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/408 Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 408, read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/408

Who must be covered in a SIMPLE. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 408, read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/408 Note how different this is from the SEP test: two preceding years at the statutory dollar floor and a reasonable expectation for the current year, against three of five years at a much lower indexed amount and an age floor.

The employer’s obligation. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 408, read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/408 Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 408, read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/408 The difference in mechanics matters. The match is dollar for dollar on what the employee actually defers and stops at the applicable percentage; the nonelective contribution goes to every eligible employee whether they defer or not.

And an optional extra. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 408, read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/408

Employee limits. Verified 2026-08-21Notice 2025-67, 2026 amounts relating to retirement plans and IRAs as adjusted for changes in cost-of-living, read at irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/n-25-67.pdf Verified 2026-08-21Notice 2025-67, 2026 amounts relating to retirement plans and IRAs as adjusted for changes in cost-of-living, read at irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/n-25-67.pdf

Vesting and timing. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 408, read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/408 Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 408, read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/408

The SIMPLE 401(k). Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 401, read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/401 It carries the same contribution pattern and the same immediate vesting, but it is a qualified plan, so it files a Form 5500 where the SIMPLE IRA files nothing.

For the self-employed person, compensation is the hard part. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 408, read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/408 Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 401, read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/401 Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 404(a)(8), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/404 Earned income is computed after the plan contribution and after half the self-employment tax, which makes it circular — the contribution reduces the base on which the contribution is computed.

Current figures

Item2026
SEP eligibilityVerified 2026-08-21IRC § 408, read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/408
SEP compensation thresholdVerified 2026-08-21Notice 2025-67, 2026 amounts relating to retirement plans and IRAs, read at irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/n-25-67.pdf
SEP ceilingVerified 2026-08-21IRC §§ 404(h) and 415(c), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/404 and /415
SIMPLE eligible employerVerified 2026-08-21IRC § 408, read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/408
SIMPLE participationVerified 2026-08-21IRC § 408, read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/408
SIMPLE matchVerified 2026-08-21IRC § 408, read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/408
SIMPLE nonelectiveVerified 2026-08-21IRC § 408, read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/408
SIMPLE deferral limitVerified 2026-08-21Notice 2025-67, 2026 amounts relating to retirement plans and IRAs as adjusted for changes in cost-of-living, read at irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/n-25-67.pdf
SIMPLE catch-upVerified 2026-08-21Notice 2025-67, 2026 amounts relating to retirement plans and IRAs as adjusted for changes in cost-of-living, read at irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/n-25-67.pdf
Compensation limitVerified 2026-08-21Notice 2025-67, 2026 amounts relating to retirement plans and IRAs as adjusted for changes in cost-of-living, read at irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/n-25-67.pdf

How it works in practice

Decide first which plan the facts describe, because the two eligibility tests share no elements. A SEP question turns on age 21, three of the last five years, and a small compensation floor. A SIMPLE question turns on the statutory dollar floor in each of two preceding years and a reasonable expectation of the same this year, with no age test at all. Answering a SEP question with the SIMPLE test is the most common error in this area and it is easy to make because both plans feel like “the small employer plan.”

For the employer contribution, be precise about which of the two SIMPLE options is in play. The match is capped at the applicable percentage of compensation and is dollar for dollar within that cap, so an employee deferring less than the percentage gets less than the full amount and an employee deferring more gets no more (IRC § 408(p)(2)(A)(iii)). The nonelective contribution is a flat percentage of compensation paid regardless of the employee’s own deferral, including to employees who defer nothing. Substituting one calculation for the other produces a wrong number every time.

For a SEP maintained by a sole proprietor, do the circular computation properly rather than applying the deduction ceiling to gross self-employment income. Net earnings from self-employment are reduced by half the self-employment tax, and earned income for plan purposes is then reduced by the contribution itself. The practical effect is that the headline SEP percentage for an unincorporated owner works out to a smaller fraction of the pre-contribution figure.

Remember that a SIMPLE must be the employer’s only plan for the year. An employer that already has a 401(k), even a dormant one to which no contributions were made but under which benefits accrued, cannot maintain a SIMPLE for the same year. That single sentence disposes of a surprising number of “which plan should this client adopt” questions.

The seasonal groundskeeper

A landscaping company has maintained a SEP planA retirement plan for self-employed people and small businesses that lets the employer contribute directly to each participant's own IRA. for six years. It employs one full-time office manager and, each summer from May to September, three groundskeepers. One of them, aged 34, has worked every summer for the last four years and earns about $14,000 a season. The owner has never made a SEP contribution for the groundskeepers, reasoning that they are seasonal and not really employees of the business year-round.

The groundskeeper must be covered. IRC § 408(k)(2) asks whether the employee has attained age 21, has performed service for the employer during at least three of the immediately preceding five years, and received at least the threshold compensation for the year. Four summers is service in four of the preceding five years — the statute counts years in which service was performed, not full-time years — and $14,000 is far above the compensation floor. Seasonal status is not an exclusion; the only exclusions IRC § 408(k)(2) recognises are collectively bargained employees and certain non-resident aliens. Because contributions must bear a uniform relationship to compensation, the omission is also a discrimination failure, not merely a shortfall for one person.

Match against nonelective

A design studio with eleven employees sponsors a SIMPLE planA retirement plan for small employers that's simpler to set up and run than a 401(k), letting both the employer and the employees contribute. IRA and has elected the 3 percent match. Of its employees, one earning $80,000 defers 8 percent, one earning $52,000 defers 1 percent, and one earning $61,000 defers nothing. The owner asks what the studio will pay, and then asks what would change under the 2 percent nonelective election.

Under the match, the studio pays 3 percent of $80,000, or $2,400, to the first employee — the match stops at the applicable percentage however much more the employee defers. It pays 1 percent of $52,000, or $520, to the second, because the match is dollar for dollar on what was actually deferred and that is less than the cap. It pays nothing to the third. Total: $2,920. Under the 2 percent nonelective election the studio pays 2 percent of each eligible employee’s compensation regardless of deferral — $1,600, $1,040 and $1,220 respectively, plus the same for every other eligible employee. Total for these three: $3,860. Which is cheaper depends entirely on the participation rate, which is why the election is worth revisiting each year during the notice period.

The consultant's own SEP

An independent consultant with no employees has net profit from Schedule C of $120,000. Her self-employment taxThe Social Security and Medicare tax a self-employed person pays directly, covering both the employee share and the employer share that a wage earner would otherwise split with an employer. for the year is $16,955, of which half is $8,478 deductible under IRC § 164(f). She wants to make the largest SEP contribution she can and has been told it is “25 percent of $120,000.”

It is not. Earned income under IRC § 401(c)(2) starts from net earnings from self-employment, computed with regard to the IRC § 164(f) deduction and with regard to the IRC § 404 deduction itself. So the base before the contribution is $120,000 less $8,478, or $111,522, and the contribution is 25 percent of that figure reduced by the contribution. Solving the circularity gives 20 percent of $111,522, or $22,304. The IRC § 415(c) annual additions limit is not reached and the compensation cap is not reached, so the answer is driven entirely by the circular computation. A contribution of $30,000 — 25 percent of the Schedule C profit — would exceed the ceiling by a wide margin.

A SEP has no employee contribution and no employee election. Every answer choice offering a salary reduction, an opt-out, or a minimum employee contribution as a condition of SEP participation is wrong. The employee’s only involvement is owning the IRA that receives the money.

The two eligibility tests share nothing. SEP: age 21, three of the last five years, the indexed compensation floor. SIMPLE: the statutory dollar floor in each of two preceding years and a reasonable expectation of the same this year, no age requirement. Answers that import the SEP age test into a SIMPLE question, or the SIMPLE dollar test into a SEP question, are the standard distractors.

Match and nonelective are computed differently, not merely at different rates. The match tracks the employee’s own deferral up to the applicable percentage and pays nothing to a non-deferrer. The nonelective contribution pays every eligible employee the flat percentage whatever they do. Treating it as a match at the lower rate produces the wrong figure for anyone who defers less than that rate or nothing at all.

SIMPLE IRA and SIMPLE 401(k) differ on reporting. They share contribution limits, catch-ups, immediate vesting and the employer contribution structure. The SIMPLE 401(k) is a qualified plan and files the Form 5500 series; the SIMPLE IRA has no annual return. An answer saying “neither has an annual filing requirement” is wrong on the 401(k) side.

How this has changed

SECURE 2.0, Division T of Pub. L. 117-328, reworked the SIMPLE in three ways. It added IRC § 408(p)(2)(A)(iv), letting the employer make an additional uniform nonelective contribution capped both as a percentage of compensation and in dollars per employee, on top of the required match or the flat nonelective election. It added the IRC § 408(p)(2)(E)(i)(II) election under which a larger employer, as the statute defines one, may use higher deferral limits, with the applicable percentage for the match rising from three to four percent for that employer. And it raised the deferral and catch-up limits for smaller employers.

The same Act ended the rule that a SEP or SIMPLE could not accept Roth contributions. Designated Roth treatment is now available for both, which matters because the traditional analysis — deduct now, tax later — is no longer the only shape these plans take.

The compensation figures move annually: both the SEP participation threshold and the SIMPLE deferral limit rose for 2026, and both are set out in the figures above. The statutory dollar figures inside IRC § 408(p) — the eligible employer test, the participation test and the cap on the additional nonelective contribution — are not indexed and have not moved.

Exam focus

Know the two eligibility tests separately and precisely, and know that a SEP is employer-funded only. Expect a question that describes a part-time or seasonal employee and asks whether the employer may exclude them; the answer for a SEP is almost always no.

Know the SIMPLE employer options and how each is computed: a dollar-for-dollar match up to the applicable percentage, or the lower flat nonelective contribution to everyone eligible. Be able to run both calculations on the same facts.

Know that the SIMPLE must be the employer’s only plan for the year, that both SIMPLE forms vest immediately, and that the SIMPLE 401(k) files a Form 5500 while the SIMPLE IRA does not. For a self-employed owner, know that the contribution base is earned income after half the self-employment tax and after the contribution itself.

Check yourself

1. An employer’s SEP covers its three full-time staff. A part-time bookkeeper, aged 45, has worked ten hours a week for the last four years and earned $9,000 last year. Must the employer contribute for her?

Answer: Yes. IRC § 408(k)(2) sets no hours requirement. She is over 21, has performed service in at least three of the immediately preceding five years, and her compensation is far above the threshold. Part-time status is not one of the permitted exclusions, and omitting her would also breach the uniform relationship requirement of IRC § 408(k)(3)(C).

2. A SIMPLE IRA sponsor elects the 3 percent match. An employee earning $50,000 defers 5 percent. What goes into the account for the year?

Answer: $4,000. The employee’s own deferral is 5 percent of $50,000, or $2,500. The match is dollar for dollar on what she defers but stops at 3 percent of compensation, so $1,500. The match does not track the full 5 percent, and it is not reduced because she deferred more than the cap.

3. The same sponsor instead elects the 2 percent nonelective contribution. An employee earning $60,000 defers 1 percent. What goes into the account?

Answer: $1,800. The nonelective contribution is 2 percent of $60,000, or $1,200, paid regardless of what the employee defers, plus her own 1 percent deferral of $600. Note the contrast with the match: under the match this employee would have received only $600 of employer money.

4. An employer has maintained a profit-sharing plan for years, with contributions made for the current year. It now wants to add a SIMPLE IRA for a newly acquired division. May it?

Answer: No. IRC § 408(p)(2)(D) provides that an arrangement is not a qualified salary reduction arrangement for a year if the employer or a predecessor maintained a qualified plan under which contributions were made or benefits accrued for service in that year. The SIMPLE must be the employer’s only plan. The division would have to be brought into the existing plan, or the profit-sharing plan frozen for a full year first.

5. A sole proprietor with $80,000 of Schedule C profit and no employees is told her maximum SEP contribution is $20,000. Is that right?

Answer: No, it is too high. Twenty-five percent of $80,000 is $20,000, but earned income under IRC § 401(c)(2) is computed after the IRC § 164(f) deduction for half of self-employment tax and after the IRC § 404 contribution itself. Reducing the profit by roughly $5,652 of deductible self-employment tax gives about $74,348, and 20 percent of that — the equivalent of 25 percent of the post-contribution figure — is about $14,870.

Change log

  • Initial draft. Separates the SEP under IRC § 408(k), which is employer-funded with a three-of-five-years eligibility test and immediate vesting through the withdrawal rule of IRC § 408(k)(4), from the SIMPLE under IRC § 408(p), which is salary-reduction based with a two-preceding-years eligibility test, a required 3 percent match or elected 2 percent nonelective contribution, and the exclusive plan requirement. Carries the 2026 amounts from Notice 2025-67 and the SECURE 2.0 additions at IRC § 408(p)(2)(A)(iv) and the 4 percent applicable percentage for electing larger employers.
  • Added a plain-language summary, typed scenarios, and glossary marks.

Related topics