Business Entities and Considerations · Business entities
Accounting periods (tax year)
tax year · reviewed 2026-08-21 · Draft for N. O. review
The accounting period rules read as though a business picks its year. For a sole proprietor and a C corporation that is roughly true. For a partnership or an S corporation it is not: the year is dictated by the owners’ years, and the entity’s preferences are irrelevant unless it can prove a business purpose that has nothing to do with deferring tax. The examination tests the dictated cases far more than the free ones, and it tests the one escape hatch — the section 444 election — hardest of all, because that escape hatch has a price questions like to leave out.
The rule
What a taxable year is. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 441, read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/441
When it is the calendar year by default. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 441(g), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/441
The 52-53 week alternative. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 441(f), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/441
Changing it. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 442, read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/442
The short period this produces. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 443(a), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/443
And how the short period is taxed. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 443(b), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/443
A partnership’s required year. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 706(b)(1), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/706
The tests inside that. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 706(b)(3), (4), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/706
An S corporation’s permitted year. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 1378, read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1378
The election out. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 444(b), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/444
What a deferral period is. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 444(b)(4), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/444
What the election costs. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 444(c), (d), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/444
Establishing a natural business year. Verified 2026-08-21Rev. Proc. 2006-46, read at irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/rp-06-46.pdf, section 5.07
When business purpose is taken as shown. Verified 2026-08-21Rev. Proc. 2006-46, read at irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/rp-06-46.pdf, section 2.06
No going back. Verified 2026-08-21Rev. Proc. 2006-46, read at irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/rp-06-46.pdf, section 2.03(3)
Current figures
| Item | Rule | Authority |
|---|---|---|
| Partnership required year | Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 706(b)(1), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/706 | IRC § 706(b)(1)(B) |
| S corporation permitted year | Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 1378, read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1378 | IRC § 1378 |
| Section 444 cap | Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 444(b), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/444 | IRC § 444(b) |
| Cost of the election | Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 444(c), (d), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/444 | IRC § 444(c) |
How it works in practice
Work a partnership’s required year in the statutory order and stop at the first test that produces an answer. Is there a taxable year that, on the testing day, was the year of partners holding more than half of profits and capital in aggregate? If so, that is the year, and nothing else is considered. If not, do all the principal partners — those meeting the statutory threshold of profits or capital (IRC § 706(b)(3)) — share a year? If so, that is the year. If neither, the calendar year. Only after all three have failed does business purpose come into it.
Two details in that sequence trip people. The majority interest test is aggregate, not individual: three partners with a fifth each who all use a June year make a June majority interest year between them, even though no one of them holds a majority. And the test is on profits and capital, so a partner holding most of the profits but only a sliver of the capital does not carry the year alone.
A partnership forced to change its year by the majority interest rule cannot be forced to change again for either of the following two years (IRC § 706(b)(4)(B)), so a partnership whose ownership is in flux does not churn its accounting period annually.
The section 444 election buys deferral and charges rent on it. The deferral period is the gap between the start of the elected year and the close of the first required year ending within it, so a partnership with a required calendar year that elects a 30 September year has the maximum three-month deferral period; a 31 October year gives two months, a 30 November year one. The cap is on the elected year, not on the amount of income involved.
For an entity changing its year the cap tightens to the shorter of three months and the deferral period of the year being changed, and that second limb defeats most elections in practice. An entity already on its required year has a deferral period of zero, so there is nothing to elect. That is the ordinary case, not a technicality: the correct advice to a calendar-year partnership that would like a September year is that section 444 does not reach it.
The rent is a required payment for a partnership or S corporation, recomputed annually and approximating the tax value of the deferral (IRC § 7519(a)), and for a personal service corporation a limit on the deduction for amounts paid to employee-owners rather than a demand for money (IRC § 280H(a)). Either way the deferral is not free, and an election that looks attractive in year one is a permanent annual computation.
The natural business year suits an entity whose seasonality genuinely justifies a non-calendar year, and the 25-percent test is stricter than it is usually described. It is not enough that the last two months of the requested year produced a quarter of receipts once. The test must be met in each of three consecutive 12-month periods; no other candidate year may produce a higher average of its three percentages; and an entity without 47 months of receipts history cannot use the route at all.
Scenarios
The three partners who agreed on June
A commercial property partnershipA business with two or more owners that itself generally pays no income tax. Instead, its income, deductions, and credits pass through and are reported by the owners. has three corporate partners: two with 20 percent each of profits and capital, both on a calendar year, and one with 60 percent, on a year ending 30 June. The partnership would prefer a calendar year for the convenience of two of its three partners.
Its required year is 30 June. On the testing day one partner held an aggregate interest in profits and capital of more than 50 percent, and that partner's year is a June year, so the majority interest taxable year under IRC § 706(b)(4)(A)(i) is the year ending 30 June. The preference of the other two is not a consideration, and neither is the fact that they are the majority by headcount. Nor can the partnership elect its way to a calendar year: section 444 is an election to have a year other than the required year, and its cap is on deferral, so it offers nothing to an entity that wants to move toward the calendar year rather than away from it.
The election that had nothing to elect
A four-partner consultancy has used the calendar year since it was formed in 2023. All four partners are individuals on calendar years, so the calendar year is also its required year. The partners would like to move to a 30 September year end so that the firm's busiest quarter falls at the start of its year, and they ask about a section 444 election.
It is unavailable. Because this is a change of taxable year, IRC § 444(b)(2) limits the deferral period of the elected year to the shorter of three months and the deferral period of the year being changed. The year being changed is the calendar year, which is the required year, so its deferral period is zero months — and the shorter of three months and zero is zero. No year other than the calendar year has a deferral period of zero, so no election can be made. The only route to a September year is a business purpose established under IRC § 706(b)(1)(C), and the partners' preference about workload is not one.
The ski resort and the two months that were not enough
A partnership operating a ski resort has annual gross receipts of about $500,000, and roughly $130,000 of that arrives in February and March. It wants a year ending 31 March, and its adviser tells it that because February and March produce more than a quarter of receipts, it has a natural business year.
The arithmetic is right and the conclusion is premature. Rev. Proc. 2006-46 requires the 25-percent result in each of three consecutive 12-month periods ending with March, and requires that no other candidate year end produce a higher average of its three percentages. If the resort also runs a summer operation whose July and August receipts are proportionally larger, a year ending 31 August may win the comparison and defeat the March request. And three years of trading gives 36 months of receipts where 47 are needed to run both the test and the comparison.
The corporation that changed its year
A C corporationA corporation taxed as its own separate entity, apart from its owners — meaning its profits can be taxed once at the corporate level and again when paid out to shareholders. with a 30 June year end obtains approval to change to a calendar year with effect from 1 January 2027. Its taxable income for the short period from 1 July to 31 December 2026 is $180,000.
Under IRC § 443(a)(1) it files a return for the short period running from 1 July 2026 to 31 December 2026, and under IRC § 443(b)(1) the income is annualised: $180,000 multiplied by 12 and divided by 6 gives $360,000, tax is computed on that, and the short-period tax is six-twelfths of the result. Annualisation exists so that a short period does not pick up a full year's worth of graduated relief — which for a corporation on a single flat rate changes nothing, but still matters to a taxpayer whose rate is graduated. The relief computation in IRC § 443(b)(2) is available on application where annualising overstates the liability.
- The majority interest test is aggregate. Partners with a common year who together exceed half of profits and capital fix the year, even if none of them individually does.
- Profits and capital. A partner with a majority of one and a minority of the other does not carry the test.
- Deferral of income is never a business purpose. IRC §§ 706(b)(1)(C) and 1378(b) both say so expressly.
- An entity on its required year cannot make a section 444 election. Its deferral period is zero, and the change cap is the shorter of three months and zero.
- The election is not free. IRC § 7519 payments for a partnership or S corporation, IRC § 280H deduction limits for a personal service corporation.
- The 25-percent test runs three times, not once. Three consecutive 12-month periods, plus a comparison against every other candidate year, plus 47 months of history.
- No retroactive changes. A change of annual accounting period cannot be made retroactively unless the Commissioner specifically authorises it.
How this has changed
The structural change here is old but its consequences are still mis-taught. Before 1986 partnerships and S corporations chose their years freely, and the standard planning move was a January year end for an entity whose owners were on calendar years, deferring eleven months of income at every level. The required year rules closed that, and section 444 was enacted as the transitional concession — which is why it is capped at three months and why it carries the IRC § 7519 required payment. Reading it as a remnant of the old regime, bought and paid for, explains every one of its limits.
The three-month cap has never moved, and the section 444 election has not been broadened since. What has changed around it is the approval machinery: automatic approval procedures for adopting, changing and retaining a year now cover most ordinary situations, so the practical question is usually which revenue procedure applies rather than whether a ruling is needed.
The 25-percent gross receipts test itself is stable, and the comparison requirement — that no other candidate year produce a higher average — is the part most often omitted from summaries. Any description of the natural business year as a single-year, single-period calculation is describing the test incompletely rather than describing an earlier version of it.
Exam focus
Two shapes account for most questions. First, a partnership with stated ownership percentages and stated partner year ends, where the answer is the required year: run the majority interest test on aggregate profits and capital, then principal partners, then the calendar year. Second, a section 444 question, where the answer is nearly always either “three months” or “no election is available because the deferral period would be zero” — and which of those two it is depends on whether the entity is on its required year already.
Where a question gives gross receipts figures and asks about a natural business year, do the arithmetic but read the options for one that raises the three-consecutive-periods requirement. Where a question gives a business reason for a year end, check whether the reason is really about deferral; if it is, no business purpose has been shown.
Check yourself
1. A partnership has four equal partners, each with 25 percent of profits and capital. Three use a calendar year and one uses a year ending 31 August. What is the partnership’s required year?
Answer: the calendar year. The three calendar-year partners hold an aggregate 75 percent of profits and capital, which is more than half, so the majority interest taxable year under IRC § 706(b)(4)(A)(i) is the calendar year. The test is aggregate, so it does not matter that no single partner holds a majority.
2. An S corporation on a calendar year, which is its required year, wishes to make a section 444 election for a year ending 30 September. May it?
Answer: no. This would be a change of taxable year, so IRC § 444(b)(2) caps the deferral period of the elected year at the shorter of three months and the deferral period of the year being changed. The calendar year is the required year, so its deferral period is zero, and no other year has a deferral period of zero. The election is unavailable.
3. A partnership with a required calendar year makes a section 444 election for a year ending 30 September. What is the deferral period, and what does the election cost?
Answer: three months, and the required payments under IRC § 7519. The deferral period is the months between the beginning of the elected year — 1 October — and the close of the first required year ending within it, 31 December, which is three months and therefore the statutory maximum. Under IRC § 444(c)(1) a partnership making the election must make the IRC § 7519 payments for as long as it stands.
4. A business whose receipts are heavily concentrated in November and December wants a year ending 31 December on the natural business year route. It has been trading for 30 months. May it establish one?
Answer: no. Rev. Proc. 2006-46 requires 47 months of gross receipts history — 36 months to run the test across three consecutive 12-month periods, plus 11 more to compare the requested year against every other candidate year. A business with 30 months of history cannot establish a natural business year under the revenue procedure whatever its seasonality.
5. A calendar-year corporation obtains approval to change to a year ending 30 September, effective for the year beginning 1 October 2026. What return is required, and how is its tax computed?
Answer: a short period return for 1 January to 30 September 2026, with the income annualised. Under IRC § 443(a)(1) the short period runs from the day after the close of the former year to the day before the first day of the new one. Under IRC § 443(b)(1) modified taxable income for the nine-month period is multiplied by 12 and divided by 9, tax is computed on that annualised figure, and the short-period tax is nine-twelfths of it.
Change log
- Initial draft. Sets out the IRC § 441 definition of the taxable year and the § 441(g) default to the calendar year, the § 442 requirement of approval for a change, the § 443 short period return and its annualisation, the § 706(b) required year for partnerships with the majority interest and principal partner tests, the § 1378 permitted year for S corporations, the § 444 election with its 3-month cap and the § 7519 and § 280H costs it carries, and the Rev. Proc. 2006-46 25-percent gross receipts test for a natural business year.
- Added a plain-language summary, glossary marks, and typed scenarios.
Related topics
- Partnerships and qualified joint ventures (QJV) 2.1.1.b
- S corporations 2.1.1.d
- Accounting methods 2.1.1.j
- Corporations 2.1.1.c
- Entity type default classifications and elections 2.1.1.g
- Filing requirements, due dates, penalties, and audit notice requirements 2.1.2.i
- Filing requirements, due dates, and penalties 2.1.3.a