TaxEar

TaxEarPart 2Business Entities and considerations

Business Entities and Considerations · Business entities

S corporations

Verification 2026 Verified
tax year · reviewed 2026-08-21 · Draft for N. O. review
  1. Domestic corporation, not an ineligible type? Certain financial institutions and insurance companies are ineligible outright
  2. 100 or fewer shareholders, with family counted as one? A common ancestor no more than 6 generations removed, and everyone descending from them, count as a single shareholder
  3. Only individuals, estates, and qualifying trusts or exempt organizations as shareholders? Most other entities as shareholders disqualify the corporation
  4. No nonresident alien shareholder? One nonresident alien shareholder ends eligibility
  5. Only one class of stock? Differences in distribution or liquidation rights create a second class; voting differences alone do not
Who may elect S corporation status — all five conditions must hold every day the election is in force
An S corporation starts as an ordinary corporation. It then asks the IRS to tax it in a new way. Normally a corporation pays tax on its own profit. Here the profit passes through and gets taxed on the owners' own returns. To keep this treatment, the corporation must keep meeting a set of rules all year. This is not just a rule for the day it applied. The rules cover how many owners it has. They cover who those owners are. They also cover how many kinds of stock it can issue. This affects owners of small, closely held firms. It decides if profit is taxed once or twice. It also decides if health coverage paid for an owner counts as taxable pay.

Subchapter S is a set of conditions attached to a corporation that is, in every other respect, an ordinary state-law corporation. Nothing about the entity changes when the election is made; what changes is that the tax stops at the entity and lands on the shareholders. The examination tests the conditions much harder than it tests the consequences, because the conditions are the part that can be lost by accident — a share issued to the wrong holder, a second class of stock created without anyone intending one, an election filed a day late.

The rule

Who may elect. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 1361(b), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1361

Each of those five conditions has to hold on every day the election is in force, not merely on the day it was made. The 100-shareholder ceiling is the one that sounds most binding and is in practice the loosest, because of the counting rule that follows.

How shareholders are counted. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 1361(c)(1), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1361

The aggregation is automatic. There is no election to make and no form to file; a family that meets the six-generation test simply is one shareholder for the purpose of the ceiling. A corporation with two hundred natural persons on its stock ledger can be comfortably inside the limit if they descend from a common ancestor.

Which trusts may hold the stock. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 1361(c)(2)(A), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1361

When the election is made. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 1362(b), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1362

The effect of the election. An S corporation is not subject to the taxes imposed by chapter 1 (IRC § 1363(a)), and its items pass through to the shareholders, who take them into account whether or not anything is distributed. A shareholder’s share of losses and deductions cannot exceed the sum of the adjusted basis of the stock and the shareholder’s adjusted basis in any indebtedness of the corporation to that shareholder (IRC § 1366(d)(1)); anything disallowed by that limit is treated as incurred by the corporation in the succeeding year with respect to that shareholder, indefinitely (IRC § 1366(d)(2)(A)).

The return. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 6072(b), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/6072

Distributions. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 1368(b), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1368

Fringe benefits. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 1372, read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1372

How the election ends. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 1362(d), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1362

Relief where it ended by accident. Where the Secretary determines that the circumstances producing an ineffective election or a termination were inadvertent, steps were taken within a reasonable period after discovery to fix them, and the corporation and every shareholder for the period agree to make the adjustments required, the corporation is treated as an S corporation throughout (IRC § 1362(f)).

The closing-of-the-books election. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 1377(a)(2), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1377

Electronic filing. Verified 2026-08-2126 CFR § 301.6037-2, read at law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/26/301.6037-2

Current figures

ItemRuleAuthority
Shareholder ceiling and stock classesVerified 2026-08-21IRC § 1361(b), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1361IRC § 1361(b)(1)
Family counted as oneVerified 2026-08-21IRC § 1361(c)(1), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1361IRC § 1361(c)(1)
Eligible trustsVerified 2026-08-21IRC § 1361(c)(2)(A), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1361IRC § 1361(c)(2)(A)
Election windowVerified 2026-08-21IRC § 1362(b), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1362IRC § 1362(b)
TerminationVerified 2026-08-21IRC § 1362(d), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1362IRC § 1362(d)
Return due dateVerified 2026-08-21IRC § 6072(b), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/6072IRC § 6072(b)
Distributions, no accumulated E&PVerified 2026-08-21IRC § 1368(b), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1368IRC § 1368(b)
Fringe benefits to ownersVerified 2026-08-21IRC § 1372, read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1372IRC § 1372
Terminating-interest electionVerified 2026-08-21IRC § 1377(a)(2), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1377IRC § 1377(a)(2)
Electronic filingVerified 2026-08-2126 CFR § 301.6037-2, read at law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/26/301.6037-2Reg. § 301.6037-2(a)

How it works in practice

The election window is the first thing to get right, and the way it is written trips people who read it quickly. There is no penalty for lateness, because there is no such thing as a late election — an election made after the fifteenth day of the third month is simply an election for the following year. A corporation formed in June that files its election in September has made a valid election, effective the following January, not an invalid one. Whether that is what the client wanted is a different question, and it is the question the practitioner has to raise before the second year’s return is prepared on the wrong assumption.

The one-class-of-stock condition is the one that is most often broken without anyone deciding to break it. The condition is about rights to distribution and liquidation proceeds, not about voting: differences in voting power alone are expressly disregarded by IRC § 1361(c)(4). What creates the risk is informal practice — a shareholder who takes distributions the others do not, a loan from a shareholder on terms that make it look like equity, a buy-sell agreement that fixes different prices for different holders. None of these is a share certificate, and all of them can produce a second class.

The fringe benefit rule at IRC § 1372 is the single most commonly missed item in S corporation practice, and its mechanics are worth being precise about. It does not disallow the benefit. The corporation still deducts what it pays. What it does is deny the shareholder the exclusion, by treating the corporation as a partnership and the shareholder as a partner, so the health insurance premium, the group-term life coverage, the meals and lodging furnished for the convenience of the employer all become compensation included in the shareholder’s income. For health insurance in particular the practical result is usually neutral or better, because the premium reported as wages is then deductible above the line, but that outcome depends on the amount actually being reported. Where it is not reported, the shareholder has taken an exclusion the statute does not allow.

Note the reach of the 2-percent test. It picks up anyone owning, or considered as owning under the IRC § 318 attribution rules, more than 2 percent of the stock on any one day of the year. A person who owns no stock at all but whose spouse owns 40 percent is a 2-percent shareholder. A person who held 3 percent for a fortnight and sold it is a 2-percent shareholder for the whole year.

Distributions under IRC § 1368(b) require the shareholder’s basis to be computed before the character of the distribution can be known, and basis is computed at the end of the year after all the year’s items have been taken into account. This produces the practical awkwardness that a shareholder who takes money out in March cannot know until the following spring whether it was a return of capital or a capital gain. Where the corporation has accumulated earnings and profits from a period before the election, IRC § 1368(c) applies instead and the ordering runs through the accumulated adjustments account first — that is a different rule, and it applies only to corporations with a C corporation history.

Scenarios

The family that looks too large

Marisol founded a produce distribution company in 1996 and elected S status the same year. She died in 2019. Her stock passed to her four children, and over the following six years it was gifted down to nineteen grandchildren, thirty-one great-grandchildren, and the spouses of eleven of them. Counting certificates, there are sixty-five holders. Marisol's nephew, who holds 2 percent from an early purchase, tells the family that the corporation is close to the ceiling and that further gifts should stop.

He is wrong, and by a wide margin. Every one of the sixty-five descends from Marisol or is the spouse of someone who does, so under IRC § 1361(c)(1) they and their estates are a single shareholder. The nephew descends from Marisol's parents, and Marisol's parents are also a common ancestor within six generations of the youngest holders, so on that reading he too falls inside the same family. The corporation has one shareholder for the purpose of the ceiling, or at most two. The condition to watch in this family is not the count — it is that a great-grandchild who marries a non-resident alien and puts stock in the spouse's name would terminate the election on the day of the transfer under IRC § 1362(d)(2).

The premium nobody put on the W-2

Devraj owns 60 percent of an engineering firm that has been an S corporationA corporation that has elected to have its income pass through to its shareholders instead of being taxed at the corporate level, subject to limits on who can own it and how many owners it can have. since 2011. The corporation pays the premiums on a family health policy covering Devraj, and has done so for years. The bookkeeper records the payments as employee benefit expense. Devraj's W-2 shows salary of $180,000 and nothing else. On his own return he claims the self-employed health insurance deduction for the $19,400 of premiums, on the footing that the corporation paid them on his behalf.

The corporation's deduction is fine. Devraj's treatment is not, in two directions at once. Under IRC § 1372 he is a partner for fringe benefit purposes, so the exclusion that an ordinary employee would have does not reach him; the $19,400 is compensation and belongs in box 1 of his W-2. And because it was never included, the above-the-line deduction he claimed has no premium reported as wages to attach to. The correction is to include the amount in wages and then take the deduction, which for Devraj is close to a wash on the income tax — but it changes his W-2, and it changes the base on which reasonable-compensation questions will be asked if the return is examined.

The March distribution and the December basis

Priya holds all the stock of a design studio that elected S status at formation and has never been a C corporation. Her stock basisWhat you're treated as having paid for something, for tax purposes. It starts at cost and moves up or down over time — basis is what gain or loss is measured against when you sell. at 1 January is $34,000. In March she takes $50,000 out of the company to fund a house deposit. The studio's year turns out well: her share of ordinary income for the year is $61,000, and there are no separately stated items.

Nothing about the March payment is determined in March. Under IRC § 1368(b) the distribution is tax-free to the extent of adjusted basis, and basis is worked out after the year's income is taken into account. The $61,000 of pass-through income increases her basis to $95,000; the $50,000 distribution reduces it to $45,000 and is entirely tax-free. Priya reports $61,000 of ordinary income and no gain on the distribution. Had the studio instead broken even, her basis would have stopped at $34,000, the first $34,000 of the distribution would have been a return of capital and the remaining $16,000 would have been gain from the sale or exchange of property under IRC § 1368(b)(2).

The shareholder who left in April

A logistics company with three equal shareholders has an unusually lopsided year: it loses money heavily through the first quarter and then wins a contract in May that makes the year profitable overall. For the full year, ordinary incomeIncome taxed at the regular income tax rates, as opposed to the lower rates that apply to long-term capital gains and qualified dividends. is $360,000. Tomás sells his entire third to the other two on 30 April. Under the default rule of IRC § 1377(a)(1) his share is worked out per day, so he picks up roughly a third of a third of the year's income — about $39,500 — on results that were, in the months he owned the stock, losses.

IRC § 1377(a)(2) offers a way out, but only on terms. Because Tomás terminated his entire interest, the corporation may elect to treat the year as two taxable years, the first ending on 30 April, with his share computed on the actual results of that period. That would give him a loss rather than income. The election requires the agreement of all affected shareholders and of the corporation, which means the two remaining shareholders must agree to absorb the whole of the profitable period. Whether they will is a negotiating point, and it is one to raise while the sale is being papered, not in February when the return is being prepared.

Traps
  • A late election is not late. It is an election for the next year (IRC § 1362(b)(3)). The client who believes they have been an S corporation since June may have been a C corporation all year.
  • Voting differences are not a second class of stock. IRC § 1361(c)(4) disregards them. Distribution and liquidation rights are what count, and those can be created by conduct.
  • The 2-percent test runs on attribution and on any single day. A spouse who owns no stock, and a shareholder who sold out in January, are both caught by IRC § 1372.
  • IRC § 1372 does not disallow the deduction. It removes the shareholder's exclusion. The corporation deducts; the shareholder includes.
  • Losses stop at basis, and debt basis means debt owed to the shareholder. A shareholder guarantee of bank debt gives no basis under IRC § 1366(d)(1)(B) — unlike the partnership rules, where a guarantee can affect the share of liabilities.
  • Passive investment income only terminates an election where there are accumulated earnings and profits. A corporation that has always been an S corporation can hold nothing but portfolio investments indefinitely; the IRC § 1362(d)(3) test needs both limbs.

How this has changed

The eligibility conditions themselves have been stable for years. What has moved is the filing mechanics.

Electronic filing of Form 1120-S used to be a requirement for large corporations only, tested by two figures at once: total assets and a return count in the hundreds. Reg. § 301.6037-2 as it now reads imposes the requirement on any S corporation required to file at least 10 returns of any type during the calendar year, and drops the asset test entirely. The count is aggregate across return types — information returns, employment tax returns and excise returns all go into it — so a small corporation issuing a modest number of Forms W-2 and 1099 is inside the requirement without ever approaching the old thresholds. The same rewrite reached the C corporation rule at Reg. § 301.6011-5. Any material that still describes an asset threshold for the mandate is describing a regime that no longer exists, and study material written before 2024 very often does.

The six-generation limit in the family aggregation rule is worth noting as a piece of history that is easily mis-stated: the rule as enacted in 2004 was framed differently, and the current formulation — the common ancestor no more than six generations removed from the youngest generation of shareholders, measured for that purpose alone — came with later amendment. Sources describing a three-generation test are describing pre-2005 law.

Exam focus

Expect the conditions rather than the consequences. The recurring shapes are: a corporation that has acquired an ineligible shareholder and the date on which the election ends; a count of shareholders where the point is the family rule; an election filed in the second half of the year and the year it takes effect; a distribution that exceeds basis, where the required answer is gain from the sale or exchange of property and not a dividend; and a fringe benefit paid to an owner, where the required answer is that it is wages.

Read the shareholder-count questions for descent before counting names. Read the election-date questions for the year in which the election was filed as well as the date within it — the fifteenth-day-of-the-third-month line only does work for an election filed during the year it is meant to govern, since an election made at any time in the preceding year is timely regardless of the date. And when a question gives you both a distribution and a year’s income, compute basis at the year end before characterising the distribution; the order is the whole of the question.

Check yourself

1. A calendar-year corporation formed on 3 February 2026 files Form 2553 on 20 July 2026. All shareholders consent. For which taxable year is the election effective?

Answer: 2027. The election was made during the taxable year but after the fifteenth day of the third month of it, so under IRC § 1362(b)(3) it is treated as made for the following taxable year. It is not invalid, and there is no relief to seek unless the corporation wants 2026 covered, which would require relief for a late election under separate administrative authority. For 2026 the entity is a C corporation.

2. An S corporation with no accumulated earnings and profits distributes $80,000 to its sole shareholder during the year. The shareholder’s basis at the start of the year is $25,000 and her share of the corporation’s ordinary income for the year is $40,000. What does she report on the distribution?

Answer: $15,000 of gain. Basis is increased by the $40,000 of income to $65,000. The distribution is tax-free to the extent of that basis under IRC § 1368(b)(1), and the $15,000 excess is treated as gain from the sale or exchange of property under IRC § 1368(b)(2). It is not a dividend.

3. A shareholder owns no stock in an S corporation. His wife owns 30 percent. The corporation pays $14,000 of premiums on a health policy covering him. How is the payment treated on his return?

Answer: as compensation, included in income. Under IRC § 1372 the corporation is treated as a partnership and any 2-percent shareholder as a partner, and the 2-percent test picks up stock a person is considered as owning under IRC § 318 — which attributes his wife’s 30 percent to him. He is a 2-percent shareholder, the employee exclusion does not reach him, and the premium is wages.

4. An S corporation that has never been a C corporation earns 80 percent of its gross receipts as interest and dividends for four consecutive years. Does the election terminate?

Answer: no. IRC § 1362(d)(3) terminates an election only where the corporation both has accumulated earnings and profits at the close of each of three consecutive years and has more than 25 percent passive investment income in each of them. A corporation that has always been an S corporation has no accumulated earnings and profits, so the first limb is never satisfied and the passive income is irrelevant.

5. An S corporation is required to file eight Forms W-2, one Form 1120-S and three Forms 1099-NEC for the calendar year. Its total assets are $900,000. Must it file Form 1120-S electronically?

Answer: yes. Reg. § 301.6037-2(a) requires electronic filing where the corporation is required to file at least 10 returns of any type during the calendar year, and the twelve returns here exceed that. The asset figure is a distractor: the former asset threshold was removed, and no reading of the current regulation makes total assets relevant.

Change log

  • Initial draft. Sets out the IRC § 1361(b)(1) eligibility conditions and the § 1361(c)(1) family aggregation rule, the § 1362(b) election window and the § 1362(d) and (f) termination and inadvertent-termination rules, the § 1363(a) absence of entity-level tax with the § 1366(d)(1) basis limitation on losses, the § 1368(b) treatment of distributions, the § 1372 fringe benefit rule for 2-percent shareholders, the § 1377(a)(2) terminating-interest election, and the Reg. § 301.6037-2(a) electronic filing requirement as rewritten to a 10-return test with no asset threshold.
  • Added a plain-language summary, a decision diagram of the five S corporation eligibility conditions, glossary marks, and typed scenarios.

Related topics