TaxEar

TaxEarPart 2Advising the business taxpayer

Business Tax Preparation · Advising the business taxpayer

Transfer of property in or out of the business (e.g., contributed property, distributions)

Verification 2026 Verified
tax year · reviewed 2026-08-21 · Draft for N. O. review
This page is about moving property into or out of a business. That means putting an asset in when a business starts. Or taking one back out later. It affects owners who fund a company with property instead of cash. It also affects owners who want a business to give property back to them. Putting property into a partnership is usually easy. It is free of tax, with very few conditions. Putting the same property into a corporation has more rules. It can even trigger tax if debt on the property is too high. Taking property back out shows the bigger gap. A partnership can usually do this free of tax. A corporation gets taxed twice on the same property leaving.

Two questions decide every transfer: is there recognition now, and where does the built-in gain go. The corporate and partnership answers differ at both ends, and the difference is much larger on the way out than on the way in — which is why a structure chosen for its formation treatment often turns out to have been chosen for the wrong reason.

The rule

Into a corporation. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 351(a), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/351 (IRC § 351(a)), with Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 351(b), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/351 (IRC § 351(b)). The corporation’s basis: Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 362(a), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/362 (IRC § 362(a)). And the trap that catches real estate: Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 357(c)(1), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/357 (IRC § 357(c)(1)).

Into a partnership. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 721(a), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/721 (IRC § 721(a)), with the partnership’s basis Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 723, opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/723 (IRC § 723). Notice the two requirements § 351 imposes that § 721 does not — control immediately after, and the transfer being solely for stock.

Where the built-in gain goes. In a corporation it is simply in the corporation’s basis and surfaces when the corporation sells. In a partnership it is tracked to the contributor: Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 704(c)(1)(A), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/704 (IRC § 704(c)(1)(A)), with an anti-abuse rule — Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 704(c)(1)(B), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/704 (IRC § 704(c)(1)(B)).

Out of a corporation. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 311(b)(1) and (a), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/311 (IRC § 311(a) and (b)(1)), and the shareholder is then taxed on the distribution under IRC § 301(c) — Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 301(c), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/301. Two levels of tax on one movement of property.

Out of a partnership. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 731(a), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/731 (IRC § 731(a)), with basis under Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 732(a), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/732 (IRC § 732(a)). No entity-level gain at all.

And liabilities move basis in a partnership. An increase in a partner’s share of partnership liabilities is a contribution of money under IRC § 752(a), a decrease is a distribution under § 752(b) — so encumbered property changes outside basis in both directions.

Current figures

ItemRuleAuthority
Into a corporationVerified 2026-08-21IRC § 351(a), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/351IRC § 351(a)
Liabilities over basisVerified 2026-08-21IRC § 357(c)(1), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/357IRC § 357(c)(1)
Into a partnershipVerified 2026-08-21IRC § 721(a), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/721IRC § 721(a)
Built-in gain trackedVerified 2026-08-21IRC § 704(c)(1)(A), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/704IRC § 704(c)(1)(A)
Seven-year ruleVerified 2026-08-21IRC § 704(c)(1)(B), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/704IRC § 704(c)(1)(B)
Out of a corporationVerified 2026-08-21IRC § 311(b)(1) and (a), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/311IRC § 311(b)(1)
Out of a partnershipVerified 2026-08-21IRC § 731(a), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/731IRC § 731(a)

How it works in practice

On the way in, the corporate rule has conditions the partnership rule does not. IRC § 721 asks only that property be contributed for an interest. IRC § 351 asks additionally that the transfer be solely for stock and that the transferors control the corporation immediately afterwards. A later contribution by an existing minority shareholder therefore fails § 351 unless it is part of a larger transaction that satisfies control, while the same contribution to a partnership is straightforwardly non-recognition.

Check basis against liabilities before contributing real property to a corporation. IRC § 357(c) recognises gain to the extent assumed liabilities exceed the total adjusted basis of the property transferred, and depreciated real property with a refinanced mortgage is exactly the fact pattern that produces it. There is no cash, no boot and no economic gain — and there is tax. A partnership contribution has no equivalent, because IRC § 752 puts the liability into outside basis instead.

The built-in gain is the real question, and the two regimes answer it differently. A corporation absorbs it: the property has a carryover basis and whoever bears the tax when it is sold is decided by who owns the stock then. A partnership tracks it: IRC § 704(c)(1)(A) requires income, gain, loss and deduction on contributed property to be allocated so as to take account of the variation at contribution, so the contributor bears their own gain however the interests later change.

Do not distribute appreciated property out of a corporation without pricing it. IRC § 311(b) recognises gain at the corporate level as if the property had been sold at fair market value, and the shareholder is then taxed on the distribution. IRC § 311(a) denies the corporation a loss on depreciated property, so the rule is one-way. A partnership distribution triggers no entity-level gain at all and no partner-level gain unless money exceeds outside basis.

Watch the seven-year window. Distributing contributed property to a partner other than the contributor within seven years accelerates the contributor’s built-in gain under IRC § 704(c)(1)(B), as though the property had been sold. This catches partnerships that reshuffle assets among partners for perfectly ordinary commercial reasons, and it is easy to miss because nothing has been sold and no cash has moved.

Property is much easier to get out of a partnership than out of a corporation. That asymmetry is the single most useful planning point here. A business expecting to hold appreciating property and later move it to the owners should think hard before putting it inside a corporation, because IRC § 311(b) makes the exit expensive and nothing undoes it short of liquidation, which is worse.

Scenarios

The mortgage that produced gain

An owner contributes a rental building to a newly formed corporation in exchange for all its stock, a Section 351 exchangeTransferring property to a corporation in exchange for its stock without recognizing gain, available when the people transferring the property end up in control of the corporation afterward.. The building’s adjusted basisWhat you're treated as having paid for something, for tax purposes. It starts at cost and moves up or down over time — basis is what gain or loss is measured against when you sell. is $310,000 after years of depreciation; it is subject to a mortgage of $460,000 the corporation assumes.

IRC § 351 would apply — property, solely for stock, control immediately afterwards — but IRC § 357(c)(1) recognises gain to the extent the liabilities assumed exceed the total adjusted basis of the property transferred. That is $150,000 of gain, recognised on a transaction in which the owner received no cash, no boot and no economic benefit at all.

Contributing the same building to a partnership produces nothing. IRC § 721(a) applies without any liabilities exception, and IRC § 752 handles the mortgage by adjusting outside basis: the owner is treated as having received a distribution of the share of the liability assumed by others and as having contributed the share they bear. The corporate route taxes a refinancing that the partnership route does not.

The gain that stayed with its owner

Two partners form a partnershipA business with two or more owners that itself generally pays no income tax. Instead, its income, deductions, and credits pass through and are reported by the owners.. One contributes cash of $500,000; the other contributes land with a basis of $120,000 and a value of $500,000. Three years later the partnership sells the land for $560,000.

The $380,000 of gain built in at contribution belongs to the contributor. IRC § 704(c)(1)(A) requires income, gain, loss and deduction on contributed property to be shared so as to take account of the variation between the partnership’s basis and the property’s value at contribution — so the contributing partner is allocated the $380,000, and only the $60,000 of post-contribution appreciation is split.

A corporation would answer differently. Under IRC § 362(a) the corporation takes the $120,000 basis and the whole $440,000 gain is corporate income, borne by the shareholders in proportion to their stock whoever contributed what. That is a materially different economic result from identical facts, and it is a formation-stage decision.

The building the company handed back

Trenance Foods, a C corporation, holds a warehouse with a basis of $400,000 and a value of $1,100,000. Its shareholders want the warehouse held personally and the company to lease it back.

Distributing it costs twice. IRC § 311(b)(1) recognises $700,000 of gain to the corporation as if the warehouse had been sold to the shareholders at fair market value, and IRC § 301(c) then taxes the shareholders on a distribution measured by the warehouse’s fair market value — a dividend to the extent of earnings and profits, which the § 311(b) gain has just increased.

The same movement out of a partnership produces no entity-level gain under IRC § 731(a) and no partner-level gain unless money distributed exceeds outside basis, with the property taking a basis under IRC § 732(a). This is the clearest illustration of why the exit belongs in the entity decision: the tax on getting the warehouse out is set by a choice made before the warehouse was bought.

The distribution before and after the seven-year mark

A partner contributes stock with a basis of $150,000 and a value of $500,000. The partnership later distributes that stock to a different partner. Nothing else about the facts changes between the two versions of this scenario except the date of the distribution.

If the distribution happens in year six, IRC § 704(c)(1)(B) treats the contributing partner as recognising the $350,000 built-in gain, because the property left to someone else within seven years of the contribution. Nothing was sold and no cash moved, but the statute treats the distribution as if the property had been sold at fair market value on that date.

If the identical distribution instead happens in year eight, the seven-year window has closed and § 704(c)(1)(B) no longer applies to it at all — the contributing partner recognises nothing on the distribution itself, and the built-in gain simply continues to be tracked to them under the ordinary § 704(c)(1)(A) allocation rule if the property is later sold. Two identical transfers, twelve months apart in relation to the contribution date, produce a taxable event in one case and none in the other.

Traps

IRC § 351 has two requirements IRC § 721 does not — the transfer must be solely for stock, and the transferors must control the corporation immediately afterwards. A contribution by an existing minority shareholder fails on control; the same contribution to a partnership does not.

IRC § 357(c) produces gain without cash. Liabilities assumed in excess of the aggregate adjusted basis of the property transferred are gain, so depreciated property with a refinanced mortgage is taxable on contribution to a corporation and not on contribution to a partnership.

IRC § 311 is one-way. Gain is recognised on distributing appreciated property as if it were sold; loss is not recognised on distributing depreciated property. Distributing a loss asset to harvest the loss does not work.

The IRC § 704(c)(1)(B) seven-year rule triggers on a distribution to another partner. Nothing is sold and no cash moves, so it is easy to miss when a partnership reallocates assets among its partners for commercial reasons.

How this has changed

The architecture is old and stable. IRC § 351 and § 721 date from the 1954 Code in substantially their present form, and the divergence between them — control and solely-for-stock on the corporate side, neither on the partnership side — has been there throughout.

The IRC § 704(c) rules have hardened. The remedial and traditional-with-curative allocation methods were regularised by regulation in 1993, and the anti-abuse rule in § 704(c)(1)(B) was extended from five years to seven for property contributed after 2 June 1997, which is the figure a candidate should carry. Material quoting five years is describing pre-1997 law.

IRC § 311(b) is itself a change: before the repeal of the General Utilities doctrine in 1986 a corporation could generally distribute appreciated property without recognising gain, which is why older planning literature treats a corporate distribution of property as unremarkable. It has not been unremarkable for forty years.

Nothing in the post-2024 legislation alters IRC §§ 351, 357, 362, 704(c), 721, 723, 731 or 732. The indirect effect runs through basis: with bonus depreciation permanent at the full statutory rate, property contributed to an entity is far more likely to carry a basis near zero, which makes IRC § 357(c) easier to trigger and IRC § 704(c) allocations larger.

Exam focus

Know the two additional IRC § 351 requirements by name, and that IRC § 721 has neither. Expect a question in which an existing shareholder contributes property and the answer turns on control.

Know IRC § 357(c) precisely: liabilities assumed in excess of the aggregate adjusted basis of the property transferred, treated as gain from the sale of the property. It is the most tested trap in this area.

Keep the two basis provisions straight — IRC § 362(a) for the corporation, IRC § 723 for the partnership — and note that both are carryover with an increase for gain recognised.

For IRC § 704(c), state the principle as an allocation requirement rather than a rate rule, and know the seven-year window and that it is triggered by a distribution to a partner other than the contributor.

Finally, contrast the exits. IRC § 311(b) recognises corporate gain on distributing appreciated property and IRC § 311(a) denies loss; IRC § 731(a) recognises partner gain only where money exceeds outside basis, and no entity gain at all.

Check yourself

1. A person already owning 30 percent of a corporation contributes equipment worth $200,000 with a basis of $80,000 in exchange for additional shares, after which they own 45 percent. Is the transfer tax-free?

Answer: No. IRC § 351(a) requires that the transferors be in control — within IRC § 368(c), at least 80 percent of the voting power and of each other class — immediately after the exchange, and 45 percent is not control. The transferor recognises $120,000 of gain and the corporation takes a cost basis. Had the same property been contributed to a partnership, IRC § 721(a) would have applied with no control requirement at all, and the partnership would have taken the $80,000 carryover basis under IRC § 723.

2. A sole shareholder contributes land with a basis of $50,000 subject to a $180,000 mortgage to a corporation in a transaction that otherwise qualifies under IRC § 351. What is recognised?

Answer: $130,000 of gain, under IRC § 357(c)(1), being the excess of the liabilities assumed over the total adjusted basis of the property transferred. The transaction still qualifies under IRC § 351 — the excess is treated as gain from the sale of the property rather than disqualifying the exchange — and the corporation’s basis under IRC § 362(a) is the carryover basis increased by the gain recognised. No cash changed hands and there was no boot.

3. A partnership distributes property contributed six years earlier to a partner other than the contributor. What happens?

Answer: The contributing partner is treated as recognising the gain or loss that IRC § 704(c)(1)(A) would have allocated on the variation had the property been sold at fair market value, under IRC § 704(c)(1)(B), because the distribution occurred within seven years of the contribution. Nothing has been sold and the contributor has received nothing, which is why the rule is missed. The distributee’s basis in the property and the contributor’s outside basis are adjusted to prevent the gain being counted twice.

4. A C corporation distributes land worth $600,000 with a basis of $900,000 to its shareholder. What does the corporation recognise?

Answer: Nothing. IRC § 311(a) provides that no gain or loss is recognised to a corporation on a distribution of property with respect to its stock, and § 311(b) creates an exception only for appreciated property — where fair market value exceeds adjusted basis. Here the property is depreciated, so the exception does not apply and the $300,000 loss is not recognised. The shareholder takes the property at its fair market value and is taxed under IRC § 301(c) on that amount, so the loss disappears entirely.

5. Why does the entity choice matter more for property that will be held and later distributed than for property that will be sold by the business?

Answer: Because the exit rules diverge sharply while the sale rules do not. If the business sells the property, both regimes recognise gain — one at the entity level and one allocated to the owners, but the tax is triggered by an event that produces cash. If the property is distributed to the owners instead, a corporation recognises gain under IRC § 311(b) as though it had sold at fair market value and the shareholder is taxed again under IRC § 301(c), all without any cash arising; a partnership recognises nothing under IRC § 731(a) and the property carries a basis under IRC § 732(a). The choice made at formation therefore prices a transaction that may not happen for twenty years.

Change log

  • Initial draft. Sets out IRC § 351 with its control requirement, boot rule and the IRC § 357(c) trap where liabilities exceed basis, against IRC § 721 with neither a control requirement nor a time limit; the carryover basis rules in IRC §§ 362 and 723; the IRC § 704(c) allocation of built-in gain and its seven-year distribution rule; and the exit asymmetry between IRC § 311(b) corporate gain recognition and the IRC §§ 731 and 732 partnership rules.
  • Added a plain-language summary, glossary marks, and a fourth typed scenario contrasting a distribution made just inside and just outside the seven-year window.

Related topics