Business Tax Preparation · Advising the business taxpayer
Life cycle of the business (e.g., formation, dissolution)
tax year · reviewed 2026-08-21 · Draft for N. O. review
- Formation Start-up and organisational costs begin to amortize once the active trade or business begins
- First 2½ months of a tax year S election window — but eligibility on every earlier day of the year controls, or the election shifts a year
- A change of ownership A partnership survives if any partner continues the business; a corporation always survives
- Exit A corporation is taxed twice on liquidation; a partnership recognizes gain only to the extent money exceeds outside basis
A business passes through four moments where tax law is decisive: formation, election, a change of ownership, and exit. Only the first is cheap. The others are governed by deadlines that have already run or by consequences fixed years earlier, which is why the useful advice at each stage is mostly about the stage after it.
The rule
Formation costs split into two categories. Start-up expenditures — Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 195(c)(1), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/195 (IRC § 195(c)(1)) — get Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 195(b)(1)(A), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/195 (IRC § 195(b)(1)(A)) with Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 195(b)(1)(B), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/195 (IRC § 195(b)(1)(B)). Organisational expenditures under IRC § 248 follow the same structure with their own limit. Note Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 195(c)(1), closing text, opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/195 (IRC § 195(c)(1)).
Getting property in. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 351(a), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/351 (IRC § 351(a)) or Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 721(a), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/721 (IRC § 721(a)), depending on the form chosen.
The election window is short and unforgiving. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 1362(b)(1) and (2), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1362 (IRC § 1362(b)(1) and (2)). And the entity classification election has its own window — Verified 2026-08-21Reg. § 301.7701-3(c)(1)(iii), opened at law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/26/301.7701-3 (Reg. § 301.7701-3(c)(1)(iii)).
Leaving subchapter S. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 1362(d)(1), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1362 (IRC § 1362(d)(1)), then Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 1362(g), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1362 (IRC § 1362(g)). Converting from C to S brings Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 1374(a), (b), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1374 (IRC § 1374).
Dissolving a corporation costs twice. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 336(a), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/336 (IRC § 336(a)), and Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 331(a) and (b), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/331 (IRC § 331(a)).
A partnership is harder to terminate than to end. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 708(b)(1), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/708 (IRC § 708(b)(1)), with Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 708(b)(2)(A), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/708 (IRC § 708(b)(2)(A)). On the way out, Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 731(a), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/731 (IRC § 731(a)).
Current figures
| Item | Rule | Authority |
|---|---|---|
| Start-up deduction | Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 195(b)(1)(A), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/195 | IRC § 195(b)(1)(A) |
| Start-up amortisation | Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 195(b)(1)(B), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/195 | IRC § 195(b)(1)(B) |
| S election window | Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 1362(b)(1) and (2), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1362 | IRC § 1362(b) |
| Revocation timing | Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 1362(d)(1), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1362 | IRC § 1362(d)(1) |
| Five-year bar | Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 1362(g), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1362 | IRC § 1362(g) |
| Corporate liquidation | Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 336(a), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/336 | IRC § 336(a) |
| Partnership termination | Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 708(b)(1), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/708 | IRC § 708(b)(1) |
How it works in practice
Fix the start date before anything else. IRC § 195 allows nothing until the active trade or business begins, and the amortisation period runs from the month it does — so a business that spends two years investigating carries every dollar until the doors open. That date is a question of fact, and the file should record what happened on it.
Do not let the S election window pass without checking eligibility for the whole year. The trap is in IRC § 1362(b)(2): an election made in the first two and a half months of a year is treated as made for the following year if on any earlier day of that year the corporation failed the § 1361(b) requirements or a person who was a shareholder on such a day did not consent. So a mid-January share issue to an ineligible holder, cured in February, pushes an otherwise timely election out by a whole year.
Advise on the exit at every stage, not only at the end. The tax cost of dissolving a corporation is set by IRC § 336 and IRC § 331 and cannot be planned around once the assets have appreciated inside it. The useful conversations are early: whether appreciating property should sit inside the entity at all, and whether the entity should have been a corporation.
Treat a change of ownership as a separate event with its own rules. A partnership does not terminate merely because partners change — IRC § 708(b)(1) requires that no part of any business, financial operation or venture continue to be carried on by any of its partners in a partnership. A corporation is even more continuous. What the ownership change does affect is basis, the IRC § 754 election, and in an S corporation the per-share per-day allocation and the possibility of a terminating election.
Remember that leaving is expensive in both directions. Revoking an S election starts the five-year bar in IRC § 1362(g), and re-electing before it expires needs the Secretary’s consent. Converting a C corporation to S status brings the IRC § 1374 built-in gains tax for the recognition period and the IRC § 1375 passive income tax where accumulated earnings and profits survive. Neither direction is a free adjustment.
Wind up in the right order. Final returns, final employment tax filings and information returns, the deposit obligations that run to the last payroll, and the retention of records long enough to cover the assessment period all continue after the business has stopped trading. A business that has ceased operating has not ceased filing.
Scenarios
The election that arrived a year late
Wexford Analytics is incorporated on 3 January and issues a small parcel of shares to a partnership investor on 10 January. The mistake is spotted and the shares are repurchased on 6 February. The corporation files Form 2553 on 12 March, within two and a half months of the start of the year.
The election is timely on its face and ineffective for the year anyway. IRC § 1362(b)(2) treats an election made during the first two and a half months as made for the following taxable year where, on one or more days in that year before the election was made, the corporation did not meet the IRC § 1361(b) requirements — and a partnership shareholder, however briefly, is such a failure.
So Wexford is a C corporation for its first year and an S corporation from the second. Nothing in the provision turns on the failure having been cured, and the repurchase does not rewrite the days on which the requirement was not met. The remedy, if the first year matters, is relief for an inadvertent invalid election, which is discretionary rather than available as of right.
The company that could not be unwound cheaply
Padgate Instruments, a C corporationA corporation taxed as its own separate entity, apart from its owners — meaning its profits can be taxed once at the corporate level and again when paid out to shareholders. formed twenty years ago, holds land bought for $200,000 and now worth $2,600,000, and its shareholders want to wind up and hold the land personally.
liquidationDissolving a corporation and distributing what's left to its shareholders, generally treated for tax purposes as if each shareholder sold their stock back to the company. costs twice. IRC § 336(a) recognises gain to the corporation on distributing the land in complete liquidation as if it had been sold to the shareholders at fair market value — $2,400,000 of corporate gain. IRC § 331(a) then treats the shareholders as having received full payment in exchange for their stock, so they have capital gain to the extent the value received exceeds their stock basis.
Neither layer can be avoided at this stage, and the alternatives are worse or unavailable: an S election does not help because IRC § 1374 taxes the built-in gain during the recognition period, and simply holding the land inside the company defers the problem to the shareholders’ heirs. The decision that made this expensive was putting appreciating land into a C corporation two decades ago.
The partnership that did not terminate
Harewood Design, a partnershipA business with two or more owners that itself generally pays no income tax. Instead, its income, deductions, and credits pass through and are reported by the owners. with four partners, sees two of them retire and get bought out over eighteen months; the remaining two continue the business with a new junior partner. The bookkeeper prepares a final Form 1065 and a new one for a new partnership.
That is wrong. IRC § 708(b)(1) provides that a partnership is considered terminated only if no part of any business, financial operation or venture of the partnership continues to be carried on by any of its partners in a partnership — and here two of the original partners continue the same business. The partnership is the same partnership, with the same taxpayer identification number, the same taxable year and the same accounting methods.
What the ownership change does affect is different. The departing partners have IRC § 731 gain to the extent money exceeds outside basis; the buyers take outside basis at cost; and an IRC § 754 election would let the partnership adjust the basis of its property to match. Treating a continuing partnership as terminated loses all of that and starts elections and periods afresh for no reason.
The S election that woke up the built-in gains tax
Longmoor Ceramics operated as a C corporation for eleven years and holds a kiln building worth $900,000 against a basis of $250,000. Its owners make an S corporationA corporation that has elected to have its income pass through to its shareholders instead of being taxed at the corporate level, subject to limits on who can own it and how many owners it can have. election effective the next calendar year, planning to sell the building two years after that once a buyer is lined up.
The election does not erase the corporation’s history. IRC § 1374 imposes a corporate-level tax on the built-in gain that existed at the start of the recognition period, computed as if the C corporation had sold its assets on the day the election became effective — here $650,000 of built-in gain on the building. A sale within the recognition period recognizes that built-in gain at the corporate level even though the entity is now taxed as an S corporation, on top of whatever passes through to the shareholders afterward. The planning point is timing the sale past the recognition period, not the election itself — making the S election does not by itself avoid the tax the corporation would have owed had it stayed a C corporation and sold the same asset.
Traps
IRC § 195 allows nothing before the active trade or business begins. The deduction is taken in the year it begins and the amortisation runs from that month, so investigation costs incurred years earlier sit dormant until then.
A timely S election can still be effective a year late. IRC § 1362(b)(2) shifts it to the following year if the corporation failed the eligibility requirements on any earlier day of the year, whether or not the failure was cured.
A partnership does not terminate when its partners change. IRC § 708(b)(1) requires that no part of any business continue to be carried on by any partner in a partnership. Filing a final return on a partner buy-out throws away the entity’s methods, elections and identification number.
Liquidating a corporation is taxed twice and neither layer is elective. IRC § 336(a) at the corporate level and IRC § 331(a) at the shareholder level, with the corporate gain increasing earnings and profits on the way through.
How this has changed
The formation rules were simplified in 2004, when the start-up and organisational provisions were given their present shape — an immediate deduction phasing out against total expenditures, with the balance amortised over a fixed period. Before that the whole amount was amortised, so a small business had nothing currently deductible. The dollar figures have not been indexed since, so the phase-out threshold now bites at a level it did not twenty years ago.
The most consequential change at the other end of the life cycle was the repeal of the General Utilities doctrine in 1986, which produced IRC § 336 in its present form. Before it a corporation could generally liquidate without recognising gain on the appreciation in its assets, and the second layer of tax on a wind-up did not exist. Every planning instinct about holding property inside a corporation dates from a regime that ended forty years ago.
The partnership termination rule was narrowed in 2017. Pub. L. 115-97 § 13504 repealed the technical termination rule in former IRC § 708(b)(1)(B), under which a sale or exchange of 50 percent or more of the interests in capital and profits within twelve months terminated the partnership — closing the taxable years, restarting depreciation periods and ending elections. For taxable years beginning after 31 December 2017 only the general rule in what is now § 708(b)(1) applies, so partnerships now survive ownership changes that formerly ended them.
Exam focus
Know the IRC § 195 structure — a deduction in the year the active trade or business begins, phasing out against total expenditures, with the balance amortised over the statutory period from that month — and that IRC § 248 mirrors it for organisational expenditures.
The S election window is heavily tested. Know both limbs of IRC § 1362(b)(1), and know the IRC § 1362(b)(2) rule that pushes an election into the following year where eligibility failed earlier in the year.
Know the revocation timing in IRC § 1362(d)(1) — the more-than-half consent, and the 15th day of the third month as the pivot — and the IRC § 1362(g) five-year bar with its consent exception.
For dissolution, be able to state both layers of a corporate liquidation with the right section for each, and contrast IRC § 731(a) where a partnership distributes.
Finally, know that the technical termination rule for partnerships is gone for years beginning after 2017, so a sale of a majority of the interests no longer terminates the partnership.
Check yourself
1. A business incurs $47,000 of start-up expenditures and begins trading in September. What may it deduct that year?
Answer: The immediate deduction is the lesser of the expenditures or the statutory amount, reduced by the excess of the expenditures over the phase-out threshold. At $47,000 the expenditures are below the threshold, so the full statutory deduction is available, and the balance is amortised ratably over the statutory period beginning with the month the active trade or business begins — September. So the first year gets the deduction plus four months of amortisation. Nothing is available for any earlier year, however long the investigation took.
2. A calendar-year corporation meets every IRC § 1361(b) requirement from 1 March onward but had a non-resident alien shareholder in January. It files Form 2553 on 10 March. When is the election effective?
Answer: For the following taxable year. IRC § 1362(b)(2) applies because the election was made during the year on or before the 15th day of the third month and, on one or more days in that year before the election was made, the corporation did not meet the IRC § 1361(b) requirements. The January failure controls even though it was cured before the filing. The corporation is a C corporation for the current year unless it obtains relief for an inadvertent invalid election, which is discretionary.
3. An S corporation revokes its election on 20 April of a calendar year, with no prospective date specified. When does the revocation take effect, and when may the corporation elect again?
Answer: From the first day of the following taxable year, because IRC § 1362(d)(1)(C)(ii) makes a revocation after the 15th day of the third month effective on the first day of the next year. It also needs the consent of shareholders holding more than one half of the shares on the day the revocation is made. Re-election is then barred by IRC § 1362(g) until the corporation’s fifth taxable year beginning after the first taxable year for which the termination was effective, unless the Secretary consents.
4. Sixty percent of the interests in a partnership are sold in a single transaction and the business continues unchanged. Does the partnership terminate?
Answer: No. The technical termination rule in former IRC § 708(b)(1)(B), which terminated a partnership on a sale or exchange of 50 percent or more of the interests in capital and profits within twelve months, was repealed by Pub. L. 115-97 § 13504 for taxable years beginning after 31 December 2017. Only the general rule now applies, and it terminates a partnership only where no part of any business, financial operation or venture continues to be carried on by any of its partners in a partnership. The taxable year, the methods and the elections all continue.
5. Why is advice about dissolution most useful at formation?
Answer: Because the cost of dissolving is determined by decisions taken years earlier and cannot be undone once value has accrued. A corporation holding appreciated property faces gain under IRC § 336(a) on liquidation as though it had sold at fair market value, plus shareholder gain under IRC § 331(a) — and converting to S status does not escape it, because IRC § 1374 taxes the built-in gain through the recognition period. The only cheap moment to decide whether appreciating property belongs inside a corporation is before it is put there.
Change log
- Initial draft. Follows the business through formation, election, operation and exit — the IRC § 195 and § 248 start-up and organisational rules with their common structure, the IRC § 1362(b) election window and the trap where an election in it is treated as made for the following year, the IRC § 1362(d) revocation timing and the § 1362(g) five-year bar, and the divergence at dissolution between IRC §§ 336 and 331 for a corporation and IRC §§ 708 and 731 for a partnership.
- Added a plain-language summary, a timeline diagram of the four life-cycle moments, glossary marks, and a fourth typed scenario on the built-in gains tax after an S election.
Related topics
- Selection of business entity (e.g., benefits and detriments) 2.2.5.e
- Transfer of property in or out of the business (e.g., contributed property, distributions) 2.2.5.h
- Proper business type, and the use of classification codes and year to year comparison 2.2.4.a
- Reporting and filing obligations (e.g., extended returns and potential penalties, international information returns, Form 1099 series, Form 8300) 2.2.5.a
- Depreciation, amortization (start-up and organizational cost), IRC Section 179, depletion, bonus depreciation, and correcting errors 2.2.2.c