Business Tax Preparation · Business assets
Converted property
tax year · reviewed 2026-08-21 · Draft for N. O. review
Property moved between personal and business use does not simply change columns. The direction of the move determines which rules apply, and a conversion into business use can leave a single asset carrying three different figures: one for depreciation, one for gain and one for loss.
The rule
Depreciation after a conversion in. Verified 2026-08-21Reg. § 1.167(g)-1, opened at law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/26/1.167(g)-1 (Reg. § 1.167(g)-1). The cap is on the depreciation basis specifically.
And the clock starts now. Verified 2026-08-21Reg. § 1.168(i)-4(b)(1), opened at law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/26/1.168(i)-4 (Reg. § 1.168(i)-4(b)(1)).
Loss on a later sale. Verified 2026-08-21Reg. § 1.165-9(b)(1), opened at law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/26/1.165-9 (Reg. § 1.165-9(b)(1)), measured by Verified 2026-08-21Reg. § 1.165-9(b)(2), opened at law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/26/1.165-9 (Reg. § 1.165-9(b)(2)).
Casualty on converted property. Verified 2026-08-21Reg. § 1.165-7(a)(5), opened at law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/26/1.165-7 (Reg. § 1.165-7(a)(5)).
Conversion the other way. Verified 2026-08-21Reg. § 1.168(i)-4(c), opened at law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/26/1.168(i)-4 (Reg. § 1.168(i)-4(c)).
Gain is not capped. No provision limits the basis for determining gain on converted property, so the original adjusted basis, reduced by depreciation taken after the conversion, governs a sale at a profit.
Current figures
| Item | Rule | Authority |
|---|---|---|
| Depreciation basis | Verified 2026-08-21Reg. § 1.167(g)-1, opened at law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/26/1.167(g)-1 | Reg. § 1.167(g)-1 |
| Fresh placed-in-service date | Verified 2026-08-21Reg. § 1.168(i)-4(b)(1), opened at law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/26/1.168(i)-4 | Reg. § 1.168(i)-4(b)(1) |
| Loss allowed at all | Verified 2026-08-21Reg. § 1.165-9(b)(1), opened at law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/26/1.165-9 | Reg. § 1.165-9(b)(1) |
| Basis for determining loss | Verified 2026-08-21Reg. § 1.165-9(b)(2), opened at law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/26/1.165-9 | Reg. § 1.165-9(b)(2) |
| Casualty basis | Verified 2026-08-21Reg. § 1.165-7(a)(5), opened at law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/26/1.165-7 | Reg. § 1.165-7(a)(5) |
| Conversion to personal use | Verified 2026-08-21Reg. § 1.168(i)-4(c), opened at law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/26/1.168(i)-4 | Reg. § 1.168(i)-4(c) |
| Adjustments to basis | Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 1016(a)(1) and (a)(2), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1016 | IRC § 1016(a) |
| Recapture on later sale | Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 1245(a)(1), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1245 | IRC § 1245(a)(1) |
How it works in practice
Three figures, and they are computed separately. On a conversion into business use the property may carry:
- a depreciation basis — Verified 2026-08-21Reg. § 1.167(g)-1, opened at law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/26/1.167(g)-1 (Reg. § 1.167(g)-1), the lesser of adjusted basis and fair market value at conversion;
- a basis for determining loss — Verified 2026-08-21Reg. § 1.165-9(b)(2), opened at law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/26/1.165-9 (Reg. § 1.165-9(b)(2)), the same lesser figure, adjusted for depreciation taken since;
- a basis for determining gain — the original adjusted basis, adjusted for depreciation taken since, with no cap at all.
Where fair market value at conversion exceeded adjusted basis, all three collapse into one figure and there is nothing to keep apart. The divergence arises only where the property had fallen in value before the conversion, which is precisely when a taxpayer is most likely to convert.
The consequence is a dead zone. Sell for more than the gain basis and there is a gain; sell for less than the loss basis and there is a loss; sell between the two and there is neither. This is the same structure as the gift rules in IRC § 1015(a), reached by a different route and for the same reason — the taxpayer should not be able to convert a personal loss into a deductible one by changing the use of the asset.
Depreciation starts fresh. Verified 2026-08-21Reg. § 1.168(i)-4(b)(1), opened at law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/26/1.168(i)-4 (Reg. § 1.168(i)-4(b)(1)). The property is treated as placed in service on the date of conversion, so it gets the full recovery period IRC § 168 prescribes for it in that year, using that year’s conventions and any elections the taxpayer makes then. Its age in the taxpayer’s hands is irrelevant, and so is any depreciation the taxpayer could not take while it was personal.
Which means the property is new for other purposes too. Because the conversion date is the placed-in-service date, the property is tested against the bonus depreciation and IRC § 179 rules in force that year — subject, for bonus depreciation, to the acquisition requirements, which a taxpayer’s own long-held property will not meet.
Converting out is a disposition for depreciation and nothing else. Verified 2026-08-21Reg. § 1.168(i)-4(c), opened at law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/26/1.168(i)-4 (Reg. § 1.168(i)-4(c)). Depreciation stops, computed for the year of change on a fractional basis, but “no gain, loss, or depreciation recapture under section 1245 or section 1250 is recognized.” The recapture potential does not disappear — the regulation says expressly that those provisions “apply to any disposition of the converted property by the taxpayer at a later date.” A business that converts a vehicle to personal use has deferred the recapture, not escaped it.
A casualty on converted property uses the same cap. Verified 2026-08-21Reg. § 1.165-7(a)(5), opened at law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/26/1.165-7 (Reg. § 1.165-7(a)(5)). This sits alongside the ordinary Reg. § 1.165-7(b)(1) rule, so the loss is the lesser of the decline in value and a basis that is itself the lesser of two figures.
The house that became a rental, and then sold
An owner bought a house for $340,000 as a residence. When the market fell she converted it to a rental. Its fair market value at conversion was $260,000. Over the following six years she claimed $52,000 of depreciation, computed on the correct basis.
Depreciation basis. Verified 2026-08-21Reg. § 1.167(g)-1, opened at law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/26/1.167(g)-1 (Reg. § 1.167(g)-1) — the lesser of the $340,000 adjusted basis and the $260,000 value, so $260,000, allocated between building and land in the usual way.
Basis for loss on sale. Verified 2026-08-21Reg. § 1.165-9(b)(2), opened at law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/26/1.165-9 (Reg. § 1.165-9(b)(2)) — $260,000 less the $52,000 of depreciation, or $208,000.
Basis for gain on sale. $340,000 less the $52,000, or $288,000. No provision caps it.
Sell for $310,000 and she has a $22,000 gain, measured against $288,000. Sell for $190,000 and she has an $18,000 loss, measured against $208,000. Sell for $250,000 — between the two — and she reports nothing: no gain, because it is below $288,000, and no loss, because it is above $208,000.
The $80,000 of decline that happened while the house was her home is never deductible, which is the whole point of the cap.
The van that went home
A contractor bought a van for $54,000 and expensed it in full under IRC § 179 in 2023. In 2026 he stops using it in the business and keeps it for family use. Its value at that point is $21,000.
Verified 2026-08-21Reg. § 1.168(i)-4(c), opened at law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/26/1.168(i)-4 (Reg. § 1.168(i)-4(c)) treats the conversion as a disposition for depreciation purposes in 2026. There is nothing left to depreciate, since the basis is nil, so that limb produces no figure.
Crucially, “no gain, loss, or depreciation recapture under section 1245 or section 1250 is recognized” on the conversion. He reports nothing in 2026, even though he took a $54,000 deduction for an asset he now uses personally.
The regulation then adds that IRC § 1245 and IRC § 1250 “apply to any disposition of the converted property by the taxpayer at a later date.” So when he sells the van for $14,000 in 2029, Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 1245(a)(1), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1245 (IRC § 1245(a)(1)) produces $14,000 of ordinary income against a nil basis — notwithstanding that by then it has been a family car for three years.
The recaptureTreating part of the gain on a sale as ordinary income rather than capital gain, because a deduction — usually depreciation — taken earlier turned out to be more generous than the asset's actual drop in value. followed the asset. It did not follow the use.
The equipment that came in from the cold
A sole proprietor has owned a workshop machine personally for four years, having paid $18,000 for it. She starts a business in 2026 and begins using it exclusively in the business. Its fair market value at that date is $11,000.
Depreciation basis is $11,000 — Verified 2026-08-21Reg. § 1.167(g)-1, opened at law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/26/1.167(g)-1 (Reg. § 1.167(g)-1), the lesser of adjusted basis and value.
Recovery period. Verified 2026-08-21Reg. § 1.168(i)-4(b)(1), opened at law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/26/1.168(i)-4 (Reg. § 1.168(i)-4(b)(1)) treats the machine as placed in service on the conversion date, so it gets the full IRC § 168 recovery period for that class starting in 2026. The four years she owned it privately do not count against it.
But not bonus depreciation. IRC § 168(k)(2)(E)(i) requires that the property “was not used by the taxpayer at any time prior to such acquisition” — and there was no acquisition here in any event. The conversion gives a placed-in-service date, not an acquisition, so the property is outside IRC § 168(k). IRC § 179 requires property acquired by purchase, which is likewise not satisfied.
She therefore depreciates $11,000 over the ordinary recovery period, and the $7,000 of value the machine lost while she owned it privately is never recovered at all.
The van that hadn't lost any value
A caterer bought a delivery van for personal errands three years ago for $28,000. She starts a catering business and begins using the van exclusively for deliveries. Because used vans are in short supply, its fair market valueWhat a willing buyer would pay a willing seller for something, with neither side being forced into the deal and both knowing the relevant facts. at conversion is $31,000 — more than she originally paid.
Verified 2026-08-21Reg. § 1.167(g)-1, opened at law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/26/1.167(g)-1 (Reg. § 1.167(g)-1) caps the depreciation basis at the lesser of adjusted basis and fair market value at conversion. Adjusted basis, at $28,000, is the lower number here, so the cap does not bite: the depreciation basis, the loss basis, and the gain basis are all $28,000. The three-way split described above only appears where value fell before the conversion; where it rose instead, as here, there is exactly one number to track.
The fire that didn't produce the loss she expected
A therapist paid $46,000 for a car she used personally, then began using it exclusively to visit clients when its fair market value had fallen to $34,000. Eighteen months later, after $10,000 of depreciationDeducting the cost of a business or income-producing asset gradually over its useful life, rather than all in the year it was bought, because the asset keeps providing value for years afterward., a fire destroys it with no insurance recovery.
She expects to deduct her real economic loss: $36,000 of remaining cost basis. Verified 2026-08-21Reg. § 1.165-7(a)(5), opened at law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/26/1.165-7 (Reg. § 1.165-7(a)(5)) caps a casualty loss on converted property at the same lesser-of measure that caps depreciation — fair market value at conversion, adjusted for depreciation since, which here is $24,000, not the $36,000 adjusted cost basis. Her deduction is capped at $24,000. The $12,000 the car had already lost in value before she ever used it for business is not part of any casualty deduction, whatever the fire actually cost her.
The cap applies to the depreciation basis and the loss basis, not to gain. {fig:conv.depreciation_basis} and {fig:conv.loss_basis}. The gain basis remains the original adjusted basis.
Between the two bases there is neither gain nor loss. Same structure as the gift rule, and for the same reason.
The cap only bites where value had fallen. Where fair market value at conversion exceeded adjusted basis, all three figures are the same.
Converting to personal use recognises nothing. {fig:conv.to_personal} (Reg. § 1.168(i)-4(c)) — but the recapture survives and applies on any later disposition.
The conversion date is a placed-in-service date, not an acquisition. So a full recovery period starts, but bonus depreciation and IRC § 179 are unavailable for want of an acquisition by purchase.
Depreciation reduces both bases. {fig:assetbasis.adjustments} (IRC § 1016(a)) applies to the property from the conversion onward, and the reduction is by the amount allowable even where less was claimed.
How this has changed
None of the regulations on this page has been amended in the period covered by current legislation, and nothing in Pub. L. 119-21 touches them. Reg. § 1.167(g)-1 dates from 1960 and Reg. § 1.165-9 from the same era; Reg. § 1.168(i)-4 was issued in 2004 to give the change-of-use rules a home under the modern cost recovery system.
What has changed is how often the conversion-out rule matters. Because expensing and bonus depreciation now write most business personal property off immediately, a business that later converts an asset to personal use has taken the whole deduction and has a nil basis. The regulation recognises nothing at the conversion, so the entire recapture waits for a sale that may be years away and may never happen if the asset is scrapped. Reg. § 1.168(i)-4(c) has not changed; the amounts riding on it have grown by an order of magnitude.
One drafting point worth knowing. Reg. § 1.165-9 is headed “Sale of residential property” and its paragraph (b) speaks of a property “purchased or constructed by the taxpayer for use as his personal residence.” The rule it states is applied more widely than its heading suggests — the same lesser-of measure appears in Reg. § 1.165-7(a)(5) for casualties and in Reg. § 1.167(g)-1 for depreciation, neither of which is confined to residences. A reader looking for the loss rule for a converted non-residential asset will not find it in a section with that heading, and the principle is the same.
Exam focus
Ask which direction the conversion went. Into business use, and the question is about three bases and a fresh recovery period. Out of business use, and the answer is that nothing is recognised now and everything is recognised later.
For a conversion in, compare fair market value at conversion with adjusted basis. If value is lower, expect a question that turns on the dead zone between the gain and loss bases.
Know that the conversion date is a placed-in-service date, so the recovery period starts fresh — but that it is not an acquisition, so bonus depreciation and expensing are unavailable.
Finally, remember that recapture survives a conversion to personal use and lands on the later disposition.
Check yourself
1. A taxpayer converts a residence with a $400,000 adjusted basis to a rental when it is worth $300,000. What is the basis for depreciation?
Answer: $300,000, allocated between building and land. Verified 2026-08-21Reg. § 1.167(g)-1, opened at law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/26/1.167(g)-1 (Reg. § 1.167(g)-1) — the fair market value at conversion, being less than the adjusted basis, is the basis for computing depreciation.
2. After $40,000 of depreciation she sells the property for $290,000. What does she report?
Answer: Nothing. Verified 2026-08-21Reg. § 1.165-9(b)(2), opened at law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/26/1.165-9 (Reg. § 1.165-9(b)(2)) gives a loss basis of $300,000 less $40,000, or $260,000, and the gain basis is $400,000 less $40,000, or $360,000. A sale at $290,000 is above the first and below the second, so there is neither gain nor loss.
3. A business converts a fully depreciated machine to the owner’s personal use. What is reported in that year?
Answer: Nothing. Verified 2026-08-21Reg. § 1.168(i)-4(c), opened at law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/26/1.168(i)-4 (Reg. § 1.168(i)-4(c)) — the conversion is a disposition for depreciation purposes only, and no gain, loss or IRC § 1245 or § 1250 recapture is recognised on it. The recapture applies to any later disposition of the converted property.
4. May a taxpayer claim bonus depreciation on property converted from personal to business use?
Answer: No. The conversion gives a placed-in-service date under Verified 2026-08-21Reg. § 1.168(i)-4(b)(1), opened at law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/26/1.168(i)-4 (Reg. § 1.168(i)-4(b)(1)) but not an acquisition, and IRC § 168(k)(2)(E)(i) requires that the property was not used by the taxpayer before the acquisition. IRC § 179 likewise requires property acquired by purchase.
5. Property worth more than its adjusted basis is converted to business use. How many bases does it have?
Answer: One. The cap in Verified 2026-08-21Reg. § 1.167(g)-1, opened at law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/26/1.167(g)-1 applies only where fair market value at conversion is less than adjusted basis, so where value is higher the depreciation basis, the gain basis and the loss basis are all the adjusted basis.
Change log
- Initial draft. Sets out the Reg. § 1.167(g)-1 rule capping the depreciation basis of converted property at fair market value where that is lower, the Reg. § 1.165-9(b)(2) separate basis for determining loss on a later sale, the Reg. § 1.165-7(a)(5) parallel rule for a casualty, and the Reg. § 1.168(i)-4 treatment of a conversion in each direction — a fresh placed-in-service date on conversion to business use, and a deemed disposition without recapture on conversion to personal use.
- Added a plain-language summary, glossary marks, and two typed scenarios (boundary, fails) rounding the scenario set out to five types.
Related topics
- Basis of assets 2.2.3.a
- Disposition of property or assets 2.2.3.b
- Depreciation, amortization (start-up and organizational cost), IRC Section 179, depletion, bonus depreciation, and correcting errors 2.2.2.c
- Casualties, thefts, and condemnations 2.2.2.k
- Like kind exchange 2.2.3.c
- Capitalization and repair regulations (e.g., elections) 2.2.3.e