TaxEar

TaxEarPart 2Business expenses, deductions and credits

Business Tax Preparation · Business expenses, deductions and credits

Employment taxes

Verification 2026 Verified
tax year · reviewed 2026-08-21 · Draft for N. O. review
When a business has employees, it deals with several payroll taxes at once, and they do not work the same way. Some come out of the employee's pay. Some are the employer's own cost on top of wages. Some stop once wages hit a yearly cap; others never stop. This page sorts out which is which. It affects any business with employees. It does not affect a sole owner with no staff, who pays self-employment tax instead. It decides how much of each tax is owed, who is personally on the hook if the money never reaches the government, and what a business can and cannot deduct.

Three separate taxes travel together on a payroll and behave differently. One is matched and capped, one is matched and uncapped, one is not matched at all, and a fourth amount on the same cheque is not the employer’s tax in any sense. Keeping them apart is the whole of the topic.

The rule

FICA on the employee. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 3101(a) and (b)(1), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/3101 (IRC § 3101(a), (b)(1)). The social security half stops at Verified 2026-08-19IRC § 1402(b)(1) read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1402, with the 2026 base at IRS Topic no. 751 (page last reviewed 20 January 2026) read at irs.gov/taxtopics/tc751; the hospital insurance half does not.

FICA on the employer. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 3111(a) and (b), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/3111 (IRC § 3111(a), (b)). Same rates, same base, imposed separately.

The additional tax the employer does not match. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 3101(b)(2), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/3101 (IRC § 3101(b)(2)).

Federal unemployment tax. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 3301, opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/3301 (IRC § 3301) on Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 3306(b)(1), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/3306 (IRC § 3306(b)(1)), with Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 3306(b)(1), second sentence, opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/3306. Against it, Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 3302(a), (b) and (c)(1), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/3302 (IRC § 3302(a), (b), (c)(1)) — but Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 3302(c)(2), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/3302 (IRC § 3302(c)(2)).

Withheld income tax. IRC § 3402(a) requires every employer making payment of wages to deduct and withhold, and the amount is the employee’s tax throughout.

Deductibility. Only the employer’s own share is deductible; Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 275(a), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/275 (IRC § 275(a)(1)).

And a personal liability. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 6672(a), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/6672 (IRC § 6672(a)).

Current figures

ItemRuleAuthority
Employee FICAVerified 2026-08-21IRC § 3101(a) and (b)(1), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/3101IRC § 3101(a), (b)(1)
Employer FICAVerified 2026-08-21IRC § 3111(a) and (b), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/3111IRC § 3111(a), (b)
Social security wage base, 2026Verified 2026-08-19IRC § 1402(b)(1) read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1402, with the 2026 base at IRS Topic no. 751 (page last reviewed 20 January 2026) read at irs.gov/taxtopics/tc751IRC § 3121(a)(1)
Additional hospital insurance taxVerified 2026-08-21IRC § 3101(b)(2), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/3101IRC § 3101(b)(2)
FUTA rateVerified 2026-08-21IRC § 3301, opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/3301IRC § 3301
FUTA wage baseVerified 2026-08-21IRC § 3306(b)(1), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/3306IRC § 3306(b)(1)
Successor employerVerified 2026-08-21IRC § 3306(b)(1), second sentence, opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/3306IRC § 3306(b)(1)
FUTA creditsVerified 2026-08-21IRC § 3302(a), (b) and (c)(1), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/3302IRC § 3302(a), (b), (c)(1)
Credit reduction statesVerified 2026-08-21IRC § 3302(c)(2), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/3302IRC § 3302(c)(2)
What is not deductibleVerified 2026-08-21IRC § 275(a), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/275IRC § 275(a)(1)
Trust fund recovery penaltyVerified 2026-08-21IRC § 6672(a), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/6672IRC § 6672(a)
Statutory employeesVerified 2026-08-21IRC § 3121(d)(3), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/3121IRC § 3121(d)(3)
Household employeesVerified 2026-08-19IRS Topic no. 756, Employment taxes for household employees, read at irs.gov/taxtopics/tc756IRC § 3121(x)

How it works in practice

Four amounts, four different characters. On one payroll an employer handles the employee’s withheld income tax, the employee’s FICA, its own FICA, and FUTA. The first two are the employee’s money held in trust; the second two are the employer’s own liabilities. That distinction decides the deduction, decides who is liable if the money is not remitted, and decides how a question about “employment taxes paid” should be answered.

Only one of the FICA components has a ceiling. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 3101(a) and (b)(1), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/3101 (IRC § 3101). IRC § 3121(a)(1) excludes from wages the remuneration paid above the contribution and benefit base, but only for the old-age, survivors and disability insurance tax — Verified 2026-08-19IRC § 1402(b)(1) read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1402, with the 2026 base at IRS Topic no. 751 (page last reviewed 20 January 2026) read at irs.gov/taxtopics/tc751 for 2026. The hospital insurance tax has no base and runs on every dollar of wages.

The additional hospital insurance tax is the employee’s alone. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 3101(b)(2), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/3101 (IRC § 3101(b)(2)). Three features distinguish it from everything else on the payroll. It is imposed on the employee only, and IRC § 3111 has no counterpart. Its thresholds depend on filing status, which an employer does not know, so the employer withholds once wages from that employer alone exceed the single threshold and any shortfall or excess is settled on the employee’s own return. And the thresholds have never been indexed.

FUTA looks like a six percent tax and is not. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 3301, opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/3301 (IRC § 3301) applies to Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 3306(b)(1), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/3306 (IRC § 3306(b)(1)) — a base that has stood at the same figure for decades and is not indexed. Against the tax, Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 3302(a), (b) and (c)(1), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/3302 (IRC § 3302(a), (b), (c)(1)), so an employer that has paid its state contributions on time in a state with no outstanding federal advances pays a small net rate. But Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 3302(c)(2), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/3302 (IRC § 3302(c)(2)): in a credit reduction state the net cost rises, and it rises retrospectively for the whole year because the reduction is determined by the position on 10 November.

The successor rule prevents a restart. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 3306(b)(1), second sentence, opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/3306 (IRC § 3306(b)(1)). An employer that buys a business and keeps the staff does not get a fresh wage base for each of them. The same principle applies to the social security base under IRC § 3121(a)(1) for a successor employer, though a mere change of employer without an acquisition does start a new base — which is why an employee with two unrelated jobs can have social security tax withheld above the annual maximum and claim the excess as a credit.

The deduction follows ownership of the liability. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 275(a), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/275 (IRC § 275(a)(1)). The employer deducts its own FICA and its FUTA. It does not deduct the withheld income tax or the employee’s FICA, because those are not its taxes — it deducts the gross wages instead, which already includes them.

And the penalty is personal. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 6672(a), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/6672 (IRC § 6672(a)). It reaches “any person required to collect, truthfully account for, and pay over” the tax who wilfully fails to do so, which means an officer, a bookkeeper or anyone with authority over which creditors get paid — not the corporation. It is measured by the whole trust fund portion, and incorporation is no protection against it.

One employee, four calculations

An employer pays a single employee $260,000 of wages in 2026. The employee is unmarried.

Employee social security. 6.2 percent of wages up to Verified 2026-08-19IRC § 1402(b)(1) read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1402, with the 2026 base at IRS Topic no. 751 (page last reviewed 20 January 2026) read at irs.gov/taxtopics/tc751, because IRC § 3121(a)(1) excludes the rest. On $184,500 that is $11,439.

Employee hospital insurance. 1.45 percent of the whole $260,000 — $3,770 — because that half of IRC § 3101(b)(1) has no wage base.

Additional hospital insurance. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 3101(b)(2), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/3101 (IRC § 3101(b)(2)) — 0.9 percent of the $60,000 above the $200,000 threshold, or $540. The employer withholds it and does not match it.

Employer FICA. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 3111(a) and (b), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/3111 (IRC § 3111) — $11,439 plus $3,770, or $15,209. Not a cent of the additional tax, because IRC § 3111 has no equivalent of IRC § 3101(b)(2).

The employer’s deduction is $15,209 plus its FUTA. The $15,749 withheld from the employee is not deductible as a tax, but the $260,000 of wages out of which it came is.

The unemployment tax that was not six percent, and then was

A company employs forty people, all earning well above the FUTA base, in a state whose unemployment fund is in good standing. Its FUTA wages are forty times Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 3306(b)(1), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/3306, or $280,000.

The gross tax at the IRC § 3301 rate is $16,800. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 3302(a), (b) and (c)(1), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/3302 (IRC § 3302(a), (b)) gives credit for the state contributions actually paid plus an additional credit up to the 5.4 percent figure, so with timely state payments the net federal tax is 0.6 percent of $280,000 — $1,680.

Now suppose the state has taken federal advances that remain outstanding. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 3302(c)(2), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/3302 (IRC § 3302(c)(2)) reduces the credit, and the reduction increases with each successive year the advances remain outstanding. A reduction of 0.3 percentage points raises the company’s net FUTA to 0.9 percent, or $2,520 — a 50 percent increase in the tax.

Two points matter for a preparer. The reduction is determined after the year has run, so the liability for wages already paid changes late. And it is a federal cost imposed because of the state’s borrowing, so an employer in a credit reduction state pays more federal unemployment tax than an identical employer across the state line.

The bookkeeper who chose which bills to pay

A failing corporation owes $190,000 of withheld income tax and employee FICA for three quarters. Its bookkeeper, who has cheque-signing authority and decides which creditors are paid, uses the money to pay suppliers so that the business can keep trading. The corporation then fails.

Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 6672(a), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/6672 (IRC § 6672(a)) reaches “any person required to collect, truthfully account for, and pay over any tax” who wilfully fails to do so. Two elements: responsibility, and wilfulness. Cheque-signing authority and the power to decide which creditors are paid supply the first. Knowing the tax was due and paying suppliers instead supplies the second — wilfulness here does not require a bad motive, only a conscious preference.

The penalty equals the total trust fund amount, $190,000, and it is personal. The bookkeeper’s lack of ownership is irrelevant, and so is the corporation’s insolvency.

Note what the penalty does not reach: the employer’s own share of FICA and its FUTA. Those are the corporation’s own taxes rather than money collected from employees, so they die with the corporation. The penalty is confined to the trust fund portion, which is exactly the money the employer never owned.

Two jobs, two wage bases, in the same year

An employee earns $140,000 from her first employer through August, then leaves and earns another $90,000 from a second, unrelated employer for the rest of 2026.

Analysis. Each employer withholds FICAThe combined Social Security and Medicare taxes withheld from an employee's wages and matched by the employer. up to {fig:se.wage_base} on the wages it alone pays — neither employer sees the other's payroll records, and there is no successor relationship between them, so nothing combines. Between the two jobs she has more social security tax withheld than the annual maximum on $230,000 of total wages. She recovers the excess as a credit on her own income tax return; neither employer's withholding was wrong on its own facts, and the fix happens only at the individual level, not on either Form W-2.

Falling behind on deposits

A struggling retailer withholds trust fund taxThe portion of payroll tax withheld from an employee's wages that an employer holds, in effect, in trust for the government until it's deposited. Failing to pay it over is treated far more seriously than an ordinary unpaid business debt. from its employees' paychecks every pay period but stops depositing it with the government for two full quarters to keep the doors open, intending to catch up later.

Analysis. The tax was due at each deposit date, not merely by the quarterly return's filing deadline, so missing deposits triggers its own penalty apart from anything owed with the return. The exposure does not stop at the business: whoever at the retailer had authority over which bills got paid is a responsible personSomeone with enough control over a business's finances to decide which bills get paid, and who can be held personally liable for the business's unpaid trust fund taxes., and the IRS can assess the trust fund recovery penaltyA penalty equal to a business's unpaid trust fund taxes, assessed personally against a responsible person who willfully failed to collect, account for, or pay them over. against that person directly once it is clear the withheld money was spent elsewhere instead of being deposited.

Traps.

Only the social security half has a wage base. IRC § 3121(a)(1) excludes wages above {fig:se.wage_base} for that tax alone. Hospital insurance runs on every dollar.

The employer does not match the additional hospital insurance tax. {fig:emp.additional_medicare} (IRC § 3101(b)(2)). IRC § 3111 has no counterpart to it.

FUTA is not six percent in practice. {fig:emp.futa_credit} (IRC § 3302). The statutory rate is reduced by the state credits to a small net figure — unless the state is a credit reduction state.

Withheld tax is not the employer's deduction. {fig:tax.never_deductible} (IRC § 275(a)(1)). It is covered by the wages deduction, not by a taxes deduction.

IRC § 6672 reaches people, not entities. {fig:emp.trust_fund_penalty}. A responsible person is personally liable for the whole trust fund amount, and the employer's own share is not part of it.

A successor employer inherits the wage base. {fig:emp.futa_successor} (IRC § 3306(b)(1)). Buying a business and keeping the staff does not restart it.

How this has changed

None of the rate or base provisions on this page was amended by Pub. L. 119-21. The FUTA rate in IRC § 3301 has read the same since Pub. L. 115-141 tidied its drafting in 2018, and the IRC § 3306(b)(1) wage base has not moved in decades — it is one of the few figures in the Code with no indexing mechanism at all, so its real value falls every year.

The additional hospital insurance tax is the same shape. IRC § 3101(b)(2) applies to wages received in a taxable year beginning after 31 December 2012, and its thresholds are stated as flat dollar amounts with no cost-of-living adjustment. Fourteen years of inflation have therefore brought it to progressively more employees, without any change in the law.

Only the social security base moves, and it moves under section 230 of the Social Security Act rather than under the Code. The Code’s role is IRC § 3121(a)(1), which excludes remuneration above “the contribution and benefit base (as determined under section 230 of the Social Security Act)” — so the figure is published by the Social Security Administration each autumn and is not in a revenue procedure. For 2026 it is Verified 2026-08-19IRC § 1402(b)(1) read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1402, with the 2026 base at IRS Topic no. 751 (page last reviewed 20 January 2026) read at irs.gov/taxtopics/tc751.

The practical consequence for a preparer is that this topic changes less than almost any other in Part 2, and that the current-year work is confined to one number.

Exam focus

Separate the four amounts before doing anything else. Employee withheld income tax, employee FICA, employer FICA, FUTA. Questions in this area almost always turn on which of the four the question is asking about.

Know that the wage base applies to the social security component only, that the additional hospital insurance tax is employee-only, and that the employer’s obligation to withhold it starts from a single threshold regardless of the employee’s filing status.

For FUTA, know the statutory rate, the base, and that the credits bring it down to a small net figure except in a credit reduction state.

Finally, know IRC § 6672 as a personal liability measured by the trust fund portion only, and be ready to reject an answer that includes the employer’s own share in it.

Check yourself

1. An employee earns $300,000 in 2026 from one employer. How much additional hospital insurance tax does the employer withhold, and how much does it match?

Answer: It withholds 0.9 percent of $100,000, or $900, because Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 3101(b)(2), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/3101 requires withholding once wages from that employer exceed the $200,000 figure. It matches nothing: IRC § 3111 imposes no counterpart to IRC § 3101(b)(2).

2. A company buys a business in July and keeps all its employees. Does it get a fresh FUTA wage base for each of them?

Answer: No. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 3306(b)(1), second sentence, opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/3306 (IRC § 3306(b)(1)) treats remuneration paid by the predecessor during the calendar year as having been paid by the successor for the purpose of the wage base, where the successor acquired substantially all the property used in the business and immediately employed the individual.

3. An employer remits $50,000 of employer FICA and $70,000 of withheld employee income tax and employee FICA. What may it deduct as a tax?

Answer: $50,000. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 275(a), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/275 (IRC § 275(a)(1)(A) and (C)) names both the employee FICA tax and tax withheld at source. The $70,000 is covered by the deduction for the gross wages from which it was withheld.

4. A corporation fails owing $120,000 of trust fund taxes and $40,000 of its own employer FICA. For how much can a responsible person be assessed under IRC § 6672?

Answer: $120,000. Verified 2026-08-21IRC § 6672(a), opened at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/6672 (IRC § 6672(a)) is measured by the tax the person was required to collect and pay over. The employer’s own share was never collected from anyone and is outside the penalty.

5. Why does an employee with two unrelated employers sometimes pay too much social security tax?

Answer: Because each employer applies the wage base to the wages it pays, and there is no mechanism for them to combine unless one is a successor to the other. The employee recovers the excess as a credit on their own return — Verified 2026-08-19IRC §§ 31(b) and 6413(c), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/31 and /6413.

Change log

  • Initial draft. Sets out the IRC § 3101 and § 3111 FICA rates on employee and employer, the IRC § 3101(b)(2) additional hospital insurance tax that the employer does not match, the IRC § 3301 FUTA rate with the IRC § 3306(b)(1) wage base and successor rule and the IRC § 3302 credit structure with its 90 percent cap and credit reduction, and the IRC § 6672 penalty on a responsible person. Notes that only the employer's share is deductible under IRC § 164 and IRC § 275(a)(1).
  • Added a plain-language summary, glossary marks, and two typed scenarios.

Related topics