Specialized Returns for Individuals · Gift tax
Gift-splitting
tax year · reviewed 2026-08-20 · Draft for N. O. review
Gift-splitting is a small election with a long tail. It lets a couple use two annual exclusions against a gift that only one of them made, which is why it exists and why it is usually right. What clients are not told is what comes with it: consent covers every gift either spouse made to anyone that year, it must be given by a date that arrives before most people think about it, and after that date it cannot be withdrawn. It also makes each spouse liable for the other’s entire gift tax for the year.
The rule
What it does. Verified 2026-08-20IRC § 2513(a), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/2513
Who may do it. Verified 2026-08-20IRC § 2513(a)(1), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/2513 And both must be citizens or residents when the gift is made — a couple where one spouse is a non-resident alien cannot split, however the return is filed.
One gift it will not reach. Verified 2026-08-20IRC § 2513(a)(1), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/2513
It is all or nothing. Verified 2026-08-20IRC § 2513(a)(2), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/2513 A couple cannot split the gifts that benefit from it and keep the others separate.
When consent must be given. Verified 2026-08-20IRC § 2513(b)(2), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/2513
And when it can be taken back. Verified 2026-08-20IRC § 2513(c), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/2513 The asymmetry is deliberate: an early consent is provisional until 15 April, a late one is final on arrival.
What it costs. Verified 2026-08-20IRC § 2513(d), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/2513
A return is still required. Verified 2026-08-20IRC § 6019, read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/6019 Splitting changes the tax, not the filing obligation — and the consent itself has to be signified on a return, so the return is how the election is made.
Current figures
| Item | Rule |
|---|---|
| The election | Verified 2026-08-20IRC § 2513(a), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/2513 |
| Marital status condition | Verified 2026-08-20IRC § 2513(a)(1), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/2513 |
| General power of appointment exception | Verified 2026-08-20IRC § 2513(a)(1), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/2513 |
| All gifts of the year | Verified 2026-08-20IRC § 2513(a)(2), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/2513 |
| Consent deadline | Verified 2026-08-20IRC § 2513(b)(2), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/2513 |
| Revocation | Verified 2026-08-20IRC § 2513(c), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/2513 |
| Joint and several liability | Verified 2026-08-20IRC § 2513(d), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/2513 |
| Return requirement | Verified 2026-08-20IRC § 6019, read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/6019 |
| Annual exclusion | Verified 2026-08-19Rev. Proc. 2025-32 §§ 2.14, 4.42, read at irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/rp-25-32.pdf |
| Non-citizen spouse exclusion | Verified 2026-08-19Rev. Proc. 2025-32 §§ 2.14, 4.42, read at irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/rp-25-32.pdf |
| Basic exclusion amount | Verified 2026-08-19IRC § 2010(c)(3) read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/2010 and Rev. Proc. 2025-32 § 2.14 read at irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/rp-25-32.pdf |
| How gifts affect the estate | Verified 2026-08-20IRC § 2001(b), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/2001 |
How it works in practice
Establish first whether splitting is needed at all. Where each spouse has their own funds, the simpler course is for each to make their own gift of up to the annual exclusion. Splitting exists for the case where the money is in one spouse’s name — a gift from a single account, or of property titled to one of them.
Then check the year, not the gift. Consent reaches every gift either spouse made to a third party during the calendar year. A couple who split a large gift in March have also split whatever either of them gave anyone in November, which may not be what either intended.
Watch the deadline, because it is earlier than the return. The gift tax return is due on the ordinary April date, but the consent cannot be signified after 15 April unless neither spouse has filed. An extension buys time to file; whether it preserves the ability to consent turns on the § 2513(b)(2) sequence, and the safe course is to decide before April.
Explain the joint liability. Section 2513(d) makes each spouse liable for the whole of both spouses’ gift tax for the year. Where one spouse has made gifts the other has not seen, or where a marriage is under strain, that is a real exposure and it lasts as long as the assessment period does.
Do not let it obscure what gifts actually do. Splitting halves each spouse’s taxable gift. It does not make the gift disappear from the estate computation: taxable gifts above the annual exclusion are added back to the base at death under § 2001(b)(1)(B). Verified 2026-08-20IRC § 2001(b), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/2001
And file even when the tax is nil. The return requirement in § 6019 keys off the gift exceeding the annual exclusion before splitting, in the hands of the spouse who actually made it.
The gift from one account
A husband gives his nephew $34,000 from an account in his sole name. His wife made no gifts that year.
Without splitting, he has made a taxable gift of $34,000 less one annual exclusionThe amount a person can give to any one recipient each year without it counting against their lifetime gift and estate tax exemption.. With his wife’s consent under § 2513, the gift is treated as $17,000 from each of them, and each $17,000 is inside a single annual exclusion, so there is no taxable gift at all. He must still file a return: § 6019 keys off the gift he made, which exceeded one annual exclusion, and the consent is signified on that return.
The consent that reached further than intended
The same couple split that gift. In November the wife had given her sister $28,000 from her own inherited funds, intending it as her gift alone.
Consent under § 2513(a)(2) applies to all gifts made by either spouse to third parties during the calendar year, so the November gift is split too — $14,000 attributed to each of them. The wife wanted the full benefit of her own annual exclusion against her own gift and has instead lent half of it to her husband’s exclusion. Whether that is better or worse depends on the numbers, but nobody chose it.
The change of mind that came a day late
A couple sign a consent on 2 April. On 20 April their adviser works out that not splitting would have been better, because the husband’s own annual exclusions were sufficient and the wife wanted to preserve hers for a later transfer.
They cannot revoke. Under § 2513(c)(1) the right to revoke a consent signified on or before 15 April does not exist after that date. Had they instead signified consent for the first time on 20 April, they could not have revoked it either — § 2513(c)(2) removes the right entirely for a late consent. The only window is signing early and changing their minds before 15 April.
The liability that outlived the marriage
A couple consent to gift-splittingAn election letting a married couple treat a gift made by one spouse as if half came from each of them, doubling the annual exclusion available for that gift. for a year in which the husband made substantial gifts of closely held stock. The valuation is later reduced on examination and a large gift tax deficiency is assessed. By then they have divorced.
She is liable for the whole of it. Section 2513(d) makes the liability of each spouse for the entire tax of that calendar year joint and several liabilityWhen spouses file a joint return, each one is fully responsible for the entire tax bill, not just half of it. The IRS can collect the whole amount from either spouse. once consent is signified, and nothing about the divorce changes that. The stock was never hers, the valuation position was not hers, and the exposure is identical to her former husband’s.
Thinking splitting is chosen gift by gift. Consent applies to every gift either spouse made to a third party that calendar year (IRC § 2513(a)(2)).
Assuming a split gift needs no return. IRC § 6019 keys off what the donor actually gave, before splitting, so a gift over one annual exclusion requires a return even if splitting leaves no taxable gift — and the consent has to be signified on a return in any event.
Missing the 15 April consent deadline. It is not the return deadline. Section 2513(b)(2)(A) closes the door on 15 April unless neither spouse has yet filed for the year.
Believing a consent can be undone. Only if it was signified on or before 15 April and is revoked by that date. A consent signified later cannot be revoked at all.
Splitting where one spouse is a non-resident alien. Section 2513(a)(1) requires each spouse to be a citizen or resident at the time of the gift.
Splitting a gift in which the donor gave the spouse a general power of appointment. Expressly excluded by § 2513(a)(1).
Overlooking § 2513(d). Consent buys an exclusion and sells joint and several liability for the whole year’s gift tax. Where one spouse has undisclosed transfers, that is the material term.
How this has changed
Section 2513 has been in its present form since 1981, when the requirement that the spouses be married throughout the year was relaxed to the current rule about remarriage. Nothing in Pub. L. 119-21 amended it, § 2503(b) or § 6019.
The figures around it have moved. The annual exclusion is indexed and now stands at Verified 2026-08-19Rev. Proc. 2025-32 §§ 2.14, 4.42, read at irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/rp-25-32.pdf, so a split gift shelters twice that amount before any taxable gift arises. What the section prints is Verified 2026-08-20IRC § 2503(b), read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/2503 — another instance of a provision whose face value has not been the operative figure for decades.
What has changed most is the reason couples split. When the lifetime exclusion was small, splitting mattered because taxable gifts consumed a scarce resource. At Verified 2026-08-19IRC § 2010(c)(3) read at law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/2010 and Rev. Proc. 2025-32 § 2.14 read at irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/rp-25-32.pdf the lifetime figure is not scarce for most families, and splitting is now mostly about staying under the annual exclusion so that no return and no reporting arises at all. That makes the joint liability in § 2513(d) a worse bargain than it used to be — the benefit purchased is administrative convenience, and the price is unchanged.
Exam focus
Expect a computation in which one spouse makes a gift and the question asks for the taxable gift with and without splitting. Halve the gift, then apply one annual exclusion to each half — not one exclusion to the whole.
Know the four conditions: married at the time of the gift, no remarriage during the year, both citizens or residents, and consent by both. Know that consent covers all gifts of the year, and know the two dates in § 2513(b)(2) and (c) — 15 April for signifying and the same date for revoking an early consent, with a late consent irrevocable.
Expect at least one question testing that a return is still required, and one on the joint and several liability in § 2513(d), which candidates consistently do not expect.
Check yourself
1. A wife gives her nephew $30,000 from her own funds. Her husband consents to split. What is each spouse’s taxable gift for 2026?
Answer: Nil for each. Under IRC § 2513(a)(1) the gift is treated as made half by each, so each has made a $15,000 gift, and each is within a single annual exclusion of Verified 2026-08-19Rev. Proc. 2025-32 §§ 2.14, 4.42, read at irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/rp-25-32.pdf.
2. In the same year the husband separately gave his brother $40,000. May the couple split only the wife’s gift?
Answer: No. IRC § 2513(a)(2) applies the consent to all gifts made by either spouse to third parties during the calendar year. Splitting one gift splits them all.
3. A couple signified consent on 10 March. On 1 May they wish to revoke it. May they?
Answer: No. IRC § 2513(c)(1) provides that the right to revoke does not exist after 15 April where the consent was signified on or before that date.
4. A husband makes a gift to a trust in which he gives his wife a general power of appointment over the interest transferred. May that gift be split?
Answer: No. IRC § 2513(a)(1) expressly excludes a gift of an interest in property in which the donor creates a general power of appointment, as defined in § 2514(c), in the consenting spouse.
5. After consenting to split, one spouse is assessed a gift tax deficiency. Who is liable?
Answer: Both, jointly and severally, for the entire gift tax of both spouses for that calendar year (IRC § 2513(d)).
Change log
- Initial draft. Sets out the IRC § 2513 election to treat a gift by one spouse as made half by each — the citizenship and marital status conditions, the general power of appointment exception, the all-or-nothing scope of the consent, the § 2513(b)(2) deadline and the § 2513(c) rule that makes a late consent irrevocable, and the § 2513(d) joint and several liability that comes with it — together with the § 6019 return requirement a split gift does not remove.
- Added a plain-language summary, typed scenarios, and glossary marks under the comprehension-layer rollout.